What's new

Police Brutality

What about when prisoners try to escape prison and are shot? I dunno the exact law on this but it has happened tons. This girl was in custody and tried to escape and therefore was brought down with force.

Already covered in the thread, but go on showcasing how American schooling failed you.

Also haven't heard details on the officer, was he a patrol officer that helped bring her in, is he a guy that works in the holding/booking station and there for doesn't have the physical requirements as other officers would.

He picked her up and brought her in.

As I also brought up and Trout did as big as he is, he definitely could've done a lot of damage by tackling her. If he had done that we could still be talking about this but instead of a tazer it would be physical abuse brutality.

Already answered, but again, likely not if he matched level of force to her level of resistance. Physical tactics are way lower on the force continuum than tasers are (and for good reason). If he tackled her and killed her in the process then I most likely would not care one bit.

According to you it isn't. Go look at Franklins post about even the liberal state of Washington allowing tasing in this instance.

You should follow the link and read part 2. :)
 
Franklin if you run from the police your *** is gonna get taken down. Plain and simple.

If you get pulled over and try to drive off they will ram you off the road or spike your tires.

If you try to escape prison you might get shot.

If you run from a cop your *** is gonna get tased.

If you dont wanna deal with the consequences then dont run from the police. Its not that complicated.
 
Franklin if you run from the police your *** is gonna get taken down. Plain and simple.

If you try to escape prison you might get shot.

If you run from a cop your *** is gonna get tased.

If you dont wanna deal with the consequences then dont run from the police. Its not that complicated.


I quit asking asking if you could really be this stupid months ago, but this gem is glaringly delusional.

In other words, Beanclown supports cops tasing 5 year old candy thieves or toddlers who are behaving "disorderly" on the playground and run away from the cop to mommy. Situations don't matter one bit.



If you get pulled over and try to drive off they will ram you off the road or spike your tires.

Bravo, beanclown, we fully get where you are coming from now. If you are speeding and get caught by a cop then that cop should skip over the lights and sirens thing and go straight to a pit maneuver or tasing you through your window. Excellent policy, boi!



Are you police brutality condoning folks done putting up the same circular arguments that have been shot to pieces multiple times already?
 
And franklin, sorry for ****ting on your thread.

I had important things to procrastinate, and felt like trolling trout (unsuccessfully). Sucks to suck.
 
Are you kidding? I sniffed trout out on the first page. This thread was begging for someone to come in and exagerate on the opposite end.
 
And franklin, sorry for ****ting on your thread.

I had important things to procrastinate, and felt like trolling trout (unsuccessfully). Sucks to suck.

It was brought to my attention that I may have insulted your intelligence. I looked back and did not see it but if I did I apologize. I think youur stance on this issue is completely wrong but I do not doubt your intelligence.
 
If you run from the police, using a taser is justifiable. What if she got into another car and ran someone over trying to get away? Then what? You stop a problem before it becomes a bigger problem.

While I don't totally disagree with this, as a cop he should know the environment he is using his tool in. He should have realized that he is about to taze a human surrounded by concrete. When you are tazed you are completely paralyzed, so there is really is only one scenario that is going to happen. You are going to fall face first on concrete. Doing that is nearly the equivalent of shooting her in the head with a gun. Would you have been ok if he shot her in the head with a gun?

If you aren't capable of quick critical thinking in crucial situations (and are as fat as a ****ing cow) maybe you should stick to working behind the desk.
 
How thick of an *** nozzle did it require to pump that many in?

























































































#11pussie

It's been a while since I've laughed out loud quite like that. Regardless of how stupid you sound in this thread, you shall receive +16 for this post. I <3 U.
 
Read the rest of your posts in this thread, hippy...er....moron/Canadian.
Completely beyond your grasp. My first two full posts and the last bit of my third:
We do as the oligarchs command.
I'm glad I don't have to live in a country where the penalty for fleeing a couple fender benders is death.
And Franklin is far closer to the middle than you are to the left, despite your insistence that you're a "liberal". As far as I can tell, you're an authoritarian conservative who just happens to not hate ****. meh.
That you're too slow to pick up on my intent is no surprise. You are one of many in this thread who has failed to comprehend the simple argument Franklin is making, and responded in your ignorance by flailing about emotionally like a complete ****ing retard.

Bravo.
 
Completely beyond your grasp. My first two full posts and the last bit of my third:



That you're too slow to pick up on my intent is no surprise. You are one of many in this thread who has failed to comprehend the simple argument Franklin is making, and responded in your ignorance by flailing about emotionally like a complete ****ing retard.

Bravo.

Wrong, hippy. I actually wrote Franklin telling him I see where he's coming from. You're the ignorant hippy that has your emotions way too involved, along with your head shoved so far up your ***, I can only conclude you're literally brainless. But whatever you say, bloke.
 
Back
Top