framer
Well-Known Member
It seriously isn't. Not enough to take on DLo for two years, plus whatever we would have to send back to match his salary.IT's massive value. Massive massive value.
It seriously isn't. Not enough to take on DLo for two years, plus whatever we would have to send back to match his salary.IT's massive value. Massive massive value.
There is probably less than a 5% chance you could get a player as good or better than Dunn with that pick. Unless Dunn has told you there is no way he is going to re-sign, you keep Dunn.
Removing the stupid idea of wanting DLo, you are going to have to match his salary, no? Are they going to take back Collins?I'd take D'Lo for free, so if the Jazz are getting paid to do so without giving anything up, you do it 100/100 times.
I think the Knicks have a pick that only conveys if the Bucks land 1-4 in a certain draft year.I remember this happening to someone's pick recently, can't remember which team, but I remember if the pick was in the lottery it went to one team and if it went outside the lottery it went to someone else.
I suppose the only way it works is if is 1st where if it doesn't convey it doesn't move forward to future years. I'm pretty sure if the Laker's pick doesn't convey it becomes a second, so in that case you could do it.
Not sure what the details of the trade would be. You wouldnt have to match dollar for dollar. The Jazz have plenty of expendable players.Removing the stupid idea of wanting DLo, you are going to have to match his salary, no? Are they going to take back Collins?
Odds are they combine picks to move up and trade other picks for future picks. Would you mind clarifying how Orlando is wasting players?Also interesting is that OKC has a full roster and 5 plus picks in a mediocre draft. They are going to waste those picks like Orlando is wasting players.
There's lots of ways to get there. It would be in a three or four team deal. We'd also be moving JC so wrap em all together if it makes it easier.Removing the stupid idea of wanting DLo, you are going to have to match his salary, no? Are they going to take back Collins?
I agree especially if it’s taking the protections off of their 2027 1st they owe us.I'd take D'Lo for free, so if the Jazz are getting paid to do so without giving anything up, you do it 100/100 times.
There is a shot he doesn’t opt in too although I doubt it but there is a non-zero chance.Also Dlo being expiring next year makes it easier to move if you want to.
Dlo seems to wear like a boat for every franchise that gets him. The greatest days are the day he gets aquired and the day he eventually gets traded.Not sure what the details of the trade would be. You wouldnt have to match dollar for dollar. The Jazz have plenty of expendable players.
IT's massive value and D'Lo is not a negative value player despite what LA media might want you to think. They just like scapegoating. Not saying he is great or that I would want to plan to keep him long-term, but there wouldnt be any issue trading him as an expiring next year and he would actively make the team better this season and next.
How many teams are trading future picks for picks in the 24 draft? Anyone who might (contenders needing to fill a slot for cheap) don't really have many picks to give.Odds are they combine picks to move up and trade other picks for future picks. Would you mind clarifying how Orlando is wasting players?
He's just gone to franchises that were in stages were they wanted to win a ring, or felt like they had to win a ring.Dlo seems to wear like a boat for every franchise that gets him. The greatest days are the day he gets aquired and the day he eventually gets traded.
I would listen to the deal where we part with Clarkson for the rest of the Lakers pick AND that Dallas pick though.