jazzfan1132
Well-Known Member
hear that trade include J.Jack, nice backup PG we need that position.
But risk is sky high who knows who Wiggins or Jabari will be???
But risk is sky high who knows who Wiggins or Jabari will be???
A backup getting paid $6M+. Overpaid. Yes, he can provide minutes, but that contract is bad. No matter how they pitch him as a player, Lindsey should be saying "salary dump, salary dump."hear that trade include J.Jack, nice backup PG we need that position.
But risk is sky high who knows who Wiggins or Jabari will be???
I'm smelling another tank year. The Jazz have totally poisoned the well for Favors here now. They have to pull the trigger.
This is the kind of deal you do for an ESTABLISHED star.
What did NY give up for Carmelo? Essentially Gallinari, Chandler and an unprotected 1st. They also shipped out Felton and Mozgov, but got back Billups and some throw-ins
Carmelo was an ESTABLISHED all-star. Gallinari and Chandler are nice players (around 13 and 15 pts/per), but I'd say Burks and Favors are more than equal. Favors has even more value as a center on a terrific contract. So yes, giving up those players PLUS a guaranteed #5 is paying more than what Denver gave up for Carmelo.
What did NJ give up for Deron? Again, a proven all-star. Arguably one of the top-3 PG's in the league at the time. Favors (who was an underachieving #3 pick) and two uncertain first rounders plus a mid-level player in Harris. Utah really has no one comparable to Harris. Maybe a guy like Marvin Williams (but he's not signed). So Utah gives up two starter-quality players in Burks and Favors PLUS an all-star potential #5 pick PLUS future assets?
This deal, as currently proposed, is wildly in the favor of Cleveland. If they need to deal and use Utah to also dump 1-2 bad contracts (Jack, Varejao or Bennett), Utah should give up LESS!
Deron trade was a complete surprise. He had another year + to go. There was no need to pull the trigger when they did. Agree with you on Carmelo.both of those guys were leveraging their way out of town, and both teams would just rather take what they got than nothing. the negotiation process was undoubtedly not in their favor, teams knew they were desperate.
I'd miss this. He also had some nice passes not shown here..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beII1Na8Tsc
Restricted. Can't view
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'd miss this. He also had some nice passes not shown here..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beII1Na8Tsc
A backup getting paid $6M+. Overpaid. Yes, he can provide minutes, but that contract is bad. No matter how they pitch him as a player, Lindsey should be saying "salary dump, salary dump."
Deron trade was a complete surprise. He had another year + to go.
This is worse than the proposed trade with Cleveland....Jack is a nice pick up to mentor Trey and is probably still better than a few starting point guards in the league so I really would not be bothered by his contract.
I just wonder how much less we would have to give up to the Bucks to get the #2 spot instead of the Cavs for #1. Jabari or Wiggins would still be there and the cost difference could be significant. Maybe the Bucks @#2 would accept #5, #23, Burks, and next year's top 3 protected pick to just drop 3 spots. Maybe.
Always good to get a fresh prospective.Wiggins and Jack for Favors, Burks, #5, and #23? That's a ton to give up......