Reputation Comments, positive and negative
- Thread starter Stickler
- Start date
LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
No.
I don't disagree with this. Like everyone else, I tend to get pos and neg for the same post. Then there are the stalkers who are ticked about something I wrote 4 months ago or whatever, but they're a different story, and, in general, despicable human beings who I want to earn a "badge of honor" from anyway. I just wish they'd be a tad more brutal in their feedback.
However, KOC's situation is definitely different. I wouldn't be surprised if a good portion of the negative rep came from people who agree with the POV. This all can change overnight with a little good behavior (i.e. calmer, more rational posts). KOC's character is pretty funny and amusing when it's not calling us all idiots.
You've made the statement several times, but I don't care to repost it. So then what is your current theory about my "duplicate account"?
I've actually received that same neg rep from Kicky... and he signed it.
It's simple, really: You've got two accounts.
You're a liar. I asked you to name the supposed "duplicate". You can't do it because it's a damn lie, and personal attack.
It's only a lie if he doesn't truly believe it. And I fail to see how it's a personal attack? Are you really that hyper sensitive? Or are you just trying to be a pain in the ***?
The word trying would imply that PIA status had not yet been achieved.
This demonstrates a fundamental disconnect with reality. While we might be merciful to one another in our general ignorance of the truth, and just not attribute the untruth to malevolence, the fact that a liar believes his own lies does not make it true.
Yep, and for mods to take that view of a personal attack speaks volumes. If it were a fact, or even if you just believed it, you could terminate my account in here and falsely assert "duplicate account" as the reason for banning me.
The fact that some people use false assertions to bully others who don't share their particular views is not an issue of being "hyper sensitive", just realistic. And in fact absolutely right.
Well, you mods are the "powers that be". It's up to you to make this a place where people have a more decent place to come and participate. Or not.
I prefer, 'Or not'. For what it's worth, I almost like your other account better, but that's really not saying much.
Here's question for you: If this isn't a decent place to come participate, why do you grace us with your presence? Wouldn't it be easier to stop coming here?
Kiri.de.carlos?
No, it's more fun to roll in the mud and counter trout in his "assistant moderator" campaign. And the moderators who think he's cool.
If he wants to be the little bully around here, he just picked the wrong kid to bully.
As long as you tolerate his open boast of being the "assistant moderator" declaring who the "duplicate accounts" are, with no facts or even speculative reasons to back up his statements, I claim the privilege of calling him out. If I was following him around and starting something, it would be one thing. But since he's the one following me around and making the issue, it's something else. For a mod to stand supportive with the abusive behavior is not a good idea.