What's new
By:

Science vs. Creationism

PearlWatson said:
Whether one takes the rib/side story literally or figuratively the symbology remains the same.

rib/side=equality, partners, side by side
Click to expand...

None of major religious books ( Bible or Quran ) talk about equality between Men and Women. Quite the opposite. But keep interpreting it the way you like and not the way it is written.
 
One Brow said:
Lenski's experiments found beneficial mutations in some generations not present in their prior generations.
Click to expand...

If you start with grandpa, you've excluded great grandpa. If you start with great grandpa you've excluded gg grandpa and so forth.

But the point is you don't see new information, just reorganized information.
 
One Brow said:
Information theory says the opposite. Given a single letter "k" and some measure of information, then for any chosen amount of information m, you can create a string x where the difference in information between xk and xkx is larger than m. There is no limit to the amount of information that can be added by gene duplication.
Click to expand...

learn the meaning of duplication, and learn the difference between more and new.

When you make a copy of something you have more information, but not new information.
 
heyhey said:
The evidence settles the matter. The only people that don't see it that way are people that don't want to give up their literal interpretation of the bible.
Click to expand...

....don't know for sure if we have used this very interesting "youtube" video but I'm posting it right now for the enjoyment of us believers in "intelligent design" and to the dismay of those who "religiously" support the evolutionary belief of Darwin! I would give a c-note to have witnessed the answers that might have been given by the pseudo-intellectuals on this board, especially AKMVP had this microphone been shoved into his face and he would have had to answer the simple question asked! I suspect he would have used "Darwins finches" or possibly the "Peppered moths"! Oh, by the way, they are still finches and they are still moths!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Tkq5j-qc8g
 
carolinajazz said:
....don't know for sure if we have used this very interesting "youtube" video but I'm posting it right now for the enjoyment of us believers in "intelligent design" and to the dismay of those who "religiously" support the evolutionary belief of Darwin! I would give a c-note to have witnessed the answers that might have been given by the pseudo-intellectuals on this board, especially AKMVP had this microphone been shoved into his face and he would have had to answer the simple question asked! I suspect he would have used "Darwins finches" or possibly the "Peppered moths"! Oh, by the way, they are still finches and they are still moths!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Tkq5j-qc8g
Click to expand...

You are an idiot. Have you or anybody on the planet have OBSERVABLE evidence of intelligent design?

And by the way London underground mosquito bites your *** again. We observed new species appearing due to unique environmental change. Have a good day.
 
AKMVP said:
You are an idiot. Have you or anybody on the planet have OBSERVABLE evidence of intelligent design?

And by the way London underground mosquito bites your *** again. We observed new species appearing due to unique environmental change. Have a good day.
Click to expand...

....it's STILL A MOSQUITO you dumb A$$! I've seen some ignorant dumb A$$'s in my life but you take the cake! This interviewer would have chewed you up and spit you out...for the dumb A$$ you are! The only thing that's not "intelligently designed" is your pathetic BRAIN that fails to comprehend what intelligent design really is!
 
carolinajazz said:
....don't know for sure if we have used this very interesting "youtube" video but I'm posting it right now for the enjoyment of us believers in "intelligent design" and to the dismay of those who "religiously" support the evolutionary belief of Darwin! I would give a c-note to have witnessed the answers that might have been given by the pseudo-intellectuals on this board, especially AKMVP had this microphone been shoved into his face and he would have had to answer the simple question asked! I suspect he would have used "Darwins finches" or possibly the "Peppered moths"! Oh, by the way, they are still finches and they are still moths!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Tkq5j-qc8g
Click to expand...

lol

We don't have a time machine so there is no way to know. der duh der

That's like not prosecuting someone for murder even though you have their dna on the murder weapon because you lack video of the incident. You are der duh der.
 
In general question like that is so stupid. First evidence of life is estimated to be around 3.7 bil years ago. Lets say it equals 100 years. Since Darwins publication 155 years ago to our day it would equal about 1 second. Since Jesus Christ to this day about 17 seconds. And even in that period of time we have seen new species appear and some getting extinct. But creationist dogmatics cry that since they did not see " observable evidence" in that 1 second or less means it did not happen. Idiots!!!
 
carolinajazz said:
....don't know for sure if we have used this very interesting "youtube" video but I'm posting it right now for the enjoyment of us believers in "intelligent design" and to the dismay of those who "religiously" support the evolutionary belief of Darwin! I would give a c-note to have witnessed the answers that might have been given by the pseudo-intellectuals on this board, especially AKMVP had this microphone been shoved into his face and he would have had to answer the simple question asked! I suspect he would have used "Darwins finches" or possibly the "Peppered moths"! Oh, by the way, they are still finches and they are still moths!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Tkq5j-qc8g
Click to expand...

That's very amusing.
 
look Darwinists have broken "evolution" into 7 sections with 6 "extinction events"

Mass_Extinction_Events.jpg
 
PearlWatson said:
look Darwinists have broken "evolution" into 7 sections with 6 "extinction events"

Mass_Extinction_Events.jpg
Click to expand...

I think in hundred years or less extinction of "creationism" is bound to happen. It is only present in small parts in USA anyway... in rest of the world it is already extinct. We should preserve it in museums for future generations to laugh at...
 
AKMVP said:
None of major religious books ( Bible or Quran ) talk about equality between Men and Women. Quite the opposite. But keep interpreting it the way you like and not the way it is written.
Click to expand...

I completely disagree with you on this.

Completely.
 
AKMVP said:
please give examples.
Click to expand...

Prior to Eve’s creation, God declared: “I am going to make a helper for him [Adam], as a complement of him.” (Genesis 2:18) Does the word “complement” imply that the woman was inferior to the man? No, because this Hebrew word can also be rendered “counterpart” or “a help corresponding to” man. Think of the complementary roles played by a surgeon and an anesthetist during surgery. Can one manage without the other? Hardly! Though the surgeon performs the actual operation, is he more important? It is hard to say. Likewise, God created the man and the woman to cooperate closely, not to compete with each other.—Genesis 2:24.

Unlike women in many other nations in ancient times, the Israelite woman enjoyed a great measure of freedom. Though the husband was given the role of the head of the family, the wife, with her husband’s full trust, could ‘consider a field and obtain it’ and ‘plant a vineyard.’ If she had skills in spinning and weaving, she could even run her own business. (Proverbs 31:11, 16-19) Women under the Mosaic Law were seen as individuals in their own right and not as just an appendage to man.

As party to the Law covenant, women were invited to listen to the reading of the Law, which provided them with opportunities to learn. (Deuteronomy 31:12; Nehemiah 8:2,*8) They could also receive training for participation in certain aspects of public worship. For example, some women likely did “organized service” at the tabernacle, while others performed in a mixed choir of singers.—Exodus 38:8; 1*Chronicles 25:5,*6.
Many women had the knowledge and skill needed to run a profitable business. (Proverbs 31:24) Contrary to the culture in other nations at that time—in which the father alone taught his sons—the Israelite mother was to share in educating her male children until adulthood. (Proverbs 31:1) Obviously, women in ancient Israel were far from being uneducated.

The Ten Commandments clearly stipulated: “Honor your father and your mother.” (Exodus 20:12) In the proverbs of wise King Solomon, we read: “Listen, my son, to the discipline of your father, and do not forsake the law of your mother.”—Proverbs 1:8.
The Law included detailed regulations regarding conduct among unmarried persons, showing respect for females. (Leviticus 18:6,*9; Deuteronomy 22:25,*26) A good husband had to take into account his wife’s physical and biological limitations.—Leviticus 18:19.

Under the Mosaic Law, women enjoyed an honorable status, and their rights were respected. However, from the fourth century B.C.E. on, Judaism started to be influenced by Greek culture, which regarded women as inferior.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top