LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
I would.
It's called evolution.
I would.
Even in homosexual relationships the partners take on gender roles...one Lesbian usually likes to "wear the pants" literally and figuratively.
The homosexual males with feminine traits tend to take on the feminine roles.
May take heat for it but I see the parenting issue this way.
Mother and Father
Two fathers/Two mothers
Single Parent (mother or father)
Effective in that order and generally speaking. I am sure we all know examples that throw that order into disarray. I do not think "married" is necessary but preffered.
We are talking abilities and brain differences such as spacial/math, language, IQ, information processing, emotions, aggression, etc.
I'm not informed about what you are talking about, but you are wrong about the ability to change.
Why should someone who has been molested be denied the opportunity to change their conditioned attraction.
Why should they be punished a second time by being told they must accept the "orientation" foisted upon them?
Obviously, having more adults take responsibility for kids is better than fewer.
polygamy is the best environment for children
ya i was just kiddin. i get your point and agreeWhen stable and built on a foundation of adult consent, why not? however, I was thinking more along the lines of grandparents, uncles, aunts, etc.
When stable and built on a foundation of adult consent, why not? however, I was thinking more along the lines of grandparents, uncles, aunts, etc.
It takes a village, or the people in the village, or the Village People...something like that.![]()
It takes a village, or the people in the village, or the Village People...something like that.![]()
This is so ignorant that I found it painful to read.
People who need to see the world on a binary-gendered basis say "A is wearing the masculine attire and B is not". People who just let people be themselves don't need to make these categories.
In each of these cases, the variance within a gender is larger than the difference of the means between the genders, making the difference meaningless in practical terms.
In the only serious attempt to measure change, the largest degree of change seen was change from being a bisexual with a modest same-sex preference to being a bisexual with a modest opposite preference. You can train people not to act on their orientation, but you can't train theri orientation out of them.
It's curious how being molested by a man supposedly makes men like having sex with men and women hate having sex with men. The reality is that molestation does not alter orientation.
bull
With IQ for example. Males are spread out on either end...dumber and smarter...while females IQ is more concentrated in the center.
99% of geniuses are men...related to the effect of testosterone on brain development.
![]()
It takes a village, or the people in the village, or the Village People...something like that.![]()
Does this study measure the social effects? ie; WIMINZ SHULD B HOAMAKERZ!
This is so ignorant that I found it painful to read.
People who need to see the world on a binary-gendered basis say "A is wearing the masculine attire and B is not". People who just let people be themselves don't need to make these categories.
I find it funny how many people assume that is automatically a bad thing regardless of circumstances. If you don't aspire to be a neurosurgeon or CEO and throw all personal desires out the window to achieve that then you are nothing but a patsy to the sexist elite apparently.
When did I say it was bad? I posed a question, and didn't get an answer.
Thanks for that.