What's new

Smart says Jazz not interested in him

No, it is not. It shows that he has a chucker mentality and was left open to dare him to shoot the three. I can't see why shooting the ball more with the same ineffectiveness could be better.

It shows me that if he ever does decide to shoot the three less, and I would assume that with a good coach he would (Travis Ford is not a good coach)…and if he can shoot 29% on 5 attempts, then I would assume that he should be able to shoot a better percentage on a lower number of attempts.

Again, this is all dependent on him shooting the three less, but the main point of the argument was showing that the comparison to Tony Allen is terrible, and lazy.
 
It shows me that if he ever does decide to shoot the three less, and I would assume that with a good coach he would (Travis Ford is not a good coach)…and if he can shoot 29% on 5 attempts, then I would assume that he should be able to shoot a better percentage on a lower number of attempts.

Again, this is all dependent on him shooting the three less, but the main point of the argument was showing that the comparison to Tony Allen is terrible, and lazy.

This explains a lot.

If he can make the transition that you speak, he will definitely have a better %3P but it is hard for players with dominant characters(especially one some consider redflag) to make that transition.

Hopefully he is coachable and understands that he won't be able contribute right away offensively. Then he can work himself up to be an All-Star.
 
I think smart is going to eventually be a great player in the NBA. You have to think...... because the Jazz didn't call him in, they could either be prepping for something bigger or making a mistake by not evaluating all their options. (which they have made this mistake in the past, several times)
 
i don't mind jazz to draft someone else

i'm off smart's bandwagon at this moment

if no one from the top3 will be available, a gordon makes more sense, i must admit this board made me change my mind
 
If you eat the right white chocolate.

It's more expensive actually, and tastes really good if was not mixed with trans oils, vegetable oil, and all kinds of other stuff to cut down on the real quality cocoa oil that is both expensive, good tasting and healthy.

Hahahaha
White chocolate isn't even actual chocolate. It has zero cocoa solids and is made of cocoa butter, powdered milk and sugar. There are some health benefits in dark chocolate due to the cacao content.
 
Hahahaha
White chocolate isn't even actual chocolate. It has zero cocoa solids and is made of cocoa butter, powdered milk and sugar. There are some health benefits in dark chocolate due to the cacao content.

I know all this and beyond. Thank you for your reply. What do you think we should call this so called chocolate that is not even a chocolate?

Hey I know! How aboot White Trash?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top