What's new

Some Things to Consider-- becoming the 04 Pistons

The-Joker

Banned..... LOLJK!!1!
Contributor
Somebody mentioned in another thread that to win a championship we either needed to build an '04 detroit type team, or get a super playmaker to be a contender. Right now I would put our money on building a Detroit team oriented type basketball squad together.
For one thing we do it efficiently, because we're pretty much the only ones left playing team ball at a high level, rather than star ball. We are already the team that plays the best team basketball and runs the best team system, via our high assist rate (which Ain't pointed out to me). I guess you could argue for the Lakers since LA runs a great offense and it even seems team oriented at times, but you exchange Boozer for Gasol,and we're the one's hoisting the trophy. Gasol is so much of a gamebreaker with his size, touch, and post moves... its hard beating him on a good team. Hell he made the Grizzlies relevant for a season for god's sake. It would be nice for the jazz to get someone like that, but they're not many options available.

So here is some statistical reasoning as to why it is improbable and inefficient to spend so much time wallowing about the missing piece acquired from the outside, and we should be focused on molding a team and a system to fit our current players from within... not to state that we don't need other players, but "smoke'em if you got'm"

I have determined that in this team, the only type of player that could propel us to greatness would be consistent all-NBA level PF/C's. Here are some of those, and the years I have determined we could use them in (please allow the hottub time machine scenario).

This is a 20 season span starting at 91, so some players may have been relevant before than, but are not counted.
KG 99'-07
Dwight Howard '07-pres
Tim Duncan 98'-09'
Pau Gasol 06'-present
Shaq 93' - 06
Karl Malone 91- 00
Olajuwon 91-97
Dirk 01' - Present (he might be finished)
Barkeley 91- 96
Ewing 91-98
David Robinson 91-98

Then there are players with one good season or injury problems like Elton Brand. But we'll stick with what we got. Then there are some maybe guys like C-Webb, Chris Bosh, Alonzo Mourning, Shawn Kemp, Dominique.... but none of them throw off the percentages too severely.

Overall this adds up to 91 total seasons where a team had a big man which would have made the current Jazz a contender (as far as I can tell, I'm sure there are more, but we'll stick with what we got, because I'm close). Multiply 29 (the average amount of teams... roughly) by 20 (the amount of seasons accounted for) and we have 580 total team seasons. These numbers together, lead up to roughly 15 percent of teams having a player over the last 20 years who could propel this team to contender hood, which is roughly 4 teams... per season.

The even more discouraging stat is that only 16 of those 91 were played on a team other than the one that drafted them. (Most of those seasons being Shaqs). Which is 3%... meaning 1 team per season had a big man they didn't draft who was significant.


What all of this means is that it is highly unlikely that we can acquire the missing piece from the outside. Pretty much anything that we can get (especially in our market) is a "close, but not good enough" piece.

This leads me back to creating an 04' Pistons team. We need to fit the system to our current players, rather than scheming up ways to acquire Dwight Howard/ ghost of Len Bias. With our team doing something so well, in a way that other teams cannot/are moving away from, we need to embrace our ball-movement/assist- style offense so that we can pinpoint the attack on the opposition in a way that only we do. We may need to find our Rasheed, we may need to grab a Ben Wallace... they may even be the same person. However it is what we do as a team that will propel us, not who we can acquire and how much we can stand toe to toe with "The 3 Kings".

With that in mind a couple of regrets---

The team wouldn't tender Miami a 2nd rounder and a trade exception to get Beasley. Beasley is also the chutes and ladder player to the glory land, even if he has had "PROBLEMS".

I realize I mentioned that we can't wallow in our own lack of bringing in players, but Beasley was a drop in the bucket to get... literally.

A center line of Okur/Fes/Koufos CANNOT win a championship in this league. Okur is a fine player and Fes shows potential. But we need a Gortat (or someone similar) to even come close to a championship dream. Koufos is just terrible.

A couple of hopes/suggestions/praises

GO GET MARC GASOL, DO WHAT EVER YOU CAN TO DO SO. HE IS HIS BROTHER. He would allow us to do so many things, we could scare the league with this Gasol brother in our team oriented offense. This would be the Rasheed/Ben Wallace synthesis for our 04 Pistons reencarnate.
 
I just made a post regarding the 2004 Pistons in the building around Deron williams thread. It took some genius GM work by Dumars. And a giant mid-season trade.With the Jazz, those are pipeline dreams.
 
I just made a post regarding the 2004 Pistons in the building around Deron williams thread. It took some genius GM work by Dumars. And a giant mid-season trade.With the Jazz, those are pipeline dreams.
Its not that we need to make the exact same moves... we need to follow their path.

You're essentially saying we need to be crucified to be like Jesus, or we're gonna fail at it, and that's not true. We maybe need a player here or there, but there is no reason to think we can't be the 2nd best team in the West. We just need to embrace our game and start looking for intrinsic value rather than extrinsic gain... although if opportunity arrises we need to be smart.
 
Its not that we need to make the exact same moves... we need to follow their path.

You're essentially saying we need to be crucified to be like Jesus, or we're gonna fail at it, and that's not true. We maybe need a player here or there, but there is no reason to think we can't be the 2nd best team in the West. We just need to embrace our game and start looking for intrinsic value rather than extrinsic gain... although if opportunity arrises we need to be smart.

I am just saying that the Pistons were a really unique team. It is not so easy to just "follow their model" and build a team that had atleast three guys making the all-NBA defensive team with one guy being the defensive player of the year(whereas we dont even have ONE player right now making even the second all-NBA defense team) and also 3 or 4 guys capable of scoring 20 on any given night. That's hard to build and thats why I gave Dumars credit. Still, they were'nt all that good offensively and if Malone was'nt injured, I am not sure if the Pistons would have won it all. So it is more likely a one-off scneario. Difficult to emulate. I mean we have not even made a start in terms of getting an ALL NBA type defensive player yet. AK was one, 5 yrs back. Not now.

You are talking about fitting the system to the players we have. We have already done that. Sloan is probably one of the best at that. But you also need better horses sometimes. You can do only so much with a Koufos or Fesenko or Miles. The Pistons got the right players and THEN they built a good system around them.
 
I've made this (or similar) comment(s) many times on this board, but I will do it again, just for the hell of it. Miami now has 3 of the top ten players in the league, which is obviously very favorable for them. But guess what? The Olympic team probably had at least 12 of the top 15 players in the whole NBA, and arguably, in the world. But they still barely beat Spain in the championship game. Why is that?
 
I've made this (or similar) comment(s) many times on this board, but I will do it again, just for the hell of it. Miami now has 3 of the top ten players in the league, which is obviously very favorable for them. But guess what? The Olympic team probably had at least 12 of the top 15 players in the whole NBA, and arguably, in the world. But they still barely beat Spain in the championship game. Why is that?

Because it's a team sport that requires chemistry, depth, good coaching and a little luck.
 
I've made this (or similar) comment(s) many times on this board, but I will do it again, just for the hell of it. Miami now has 3 of the top ten players in the league, which is obviously very favorable for them. But guess what? The Olympic team probably had at least 12 of the top 15 players in the whole NBA, and arguably, in the world. But they still barely beat Spain in the championship game. Why is that?

Stern rigged the officiating to make sure the international audience would remain interested in the games... so they would eventually become Kobe / Lebron / Wade fans
 
Because it's a team sport that requires chemistry, depth, good coaching and a little luck.

Well, OK, Rich, I buy that. Did the USA lack good coachin? Depth? Chemistry? Or did Spain just have more of it, or what, exactly, ya figure?
 
I've made this (or similar) comment(s) many times on this board, but I will do it again, just for the hell of it. Miami now has 3 of the top ten players in the league, which is obviously very favorable for them. But guess what? The Olympic team probably had at least 12 of the top 15 players in the whole NBA, and arguably, in the world. But they still barely beat Spain in the championship game. Why is that?

Maybe... just maybe. We need to quit being an NBA team, and become a brotherhood.
I'm down with that.
 
Well, OK, Rich, I buy that. Did the USA lack good coachin? Depth? Chemistry? Or did Spain just have more of it, or what, exactly, ya figure?

I think they lacked chemistry in part, plus when you have that many superstars together it is hard for them to be unselfish. If the big three in Miami are willing to accept an altered role in order to win, and they can find enough ring chasers, they have a good shot at getting some rings. But I still think the Lakers with their current lineup will be pretty heavily favored because of the amount of time they've played together and accepted the role.
 
I think they lacked chemistry in part, plus when you have that many superstars together it is hard for them to be unselfish.

Well, they *seemed* to have OK chemistry, but let's just say Spain had better chemistry, a LOT better, even. So what? How can sumthin like "chemistry" come that close to beating vastly superior individual talent?
 
An Olympic team consists of 10-15 STARS, playing together for just a few months, and with a new coach. Cannot use this scenario in any way to draw conclusions with respect to NBA, where you have typically 2-3 stars on a team and a bunch of role players who have played together for several months or even years, under maybe the same Coach.
 
An Olympic team consists of 10-15 STARS, playing together for just a few months, and with a new coach. Cannot use this scenario in any way to draw conclusions with respect to NBA, where you have typically 2-3 stars on a team and a bunch of role players who have played together for several months or even years, under maybe the same Coach.

Well, VJ, are ya suggestin, then, that the USA would have won more convincingly if they'd just sent a good NBA team (like the Jazz, mebbe) over there, instead of all-NBA players?
 
Well, VJ, are ya suggestin, then, that the USA would have won more convincingly if they'd just sent a good NBA team (like the Jazz, mebbe) over there, instead of all-NBA players?

I am not suggesting anything. I am just saying that I would'nt use anything that happens in the Olympics to draw conclusions in the NBA. Two totally different setups. The players, the coach, the setting, the preparation time, the opponents, just about everything is different.
 
I am not suggesting anything. I am just saying that I would'nt use anything that happens in the Olympics to draw conclusions in the NBA.

Well, that's fine, but none of my posts really had anything to do with the NBA. It had to do with the Olympics, specifically, the game against Spain, ya know?

I'm still kinda hopin for an answer to my question, which was: How could Spain come so close to beatin a USA team which had vastly superior individual talent?
 
But purely from a hypothetical point of view, it would be interesting to debate/discuss what would be the outcome if we send the eventual NBA champions every time to the Olympics. What if a completely 2010 Lakers squad would have played in the Olympics? But then again Gasol has to suit up for the USA, not Spain. It gets a little too far-fetched to even imagine.
 
Well, that's fine, but none of my posts really had anything to do with the NBA. It had to do with the Olympics, specifically, the game against Spain, ya know?

and the point that you were trying to make, was? Because, this is a thread about building a successful NBA team.

And looks like you did mention something about the Heat.
 
I'm axxin a question, not makin a point.


and obviously you had something in mind, that drove you to ask that question? I wanted to know what that was.It seemed semi-rhetorical to me, not like an actual question.
And what relevance does that have to this thread about the Pistons.
 
There could be many reasons as to why the Olympic team was'nt as dominating in the Finals as they should be on paper.
Maybe they were just bored.

what has that got do with the the current Heat and 2004 Pistons?
 
Back
Top