My guess is that any nominee might skirt by more than just a party-line vote. Manchin and Sinema will vote for whomever they choose and in the past, even people like Graham have voted for liberal justices to keep court balance.
Remember, Merrick Garland had support among the Republicans as someone who is qualified for the job that Obama wouldn't even consider as a moderate until he was actually nominated and Turtle Man ran back to his shell to hide in for eight months.
Remember, Merrick Garland had support among the Republicans as someone who is qualified for the job that Obama wouldn't even consider as a moderate until he was actually nominated and Turtle Man ran back to his shell to hide in for eight months.
Democrats also voted for Gorsuch and Kav. The Coney Barrett nomination was clearly beyond the pale and even Susan Collins couldn't support it.
I just find it interesting that Republicans aren't even included anymore by the media and conservative posters here. Like they're not even trying to participate in democracy. We just assume that everything that happens, they'll be against, and it'll be up to every single Democrat to vote lockstep with the party to make it work. What happened to putting country before party? Not one single Republican is open to voting for this nominee? We don't even act like Republicans are open to discussion. It's just amazing. It actually puts a spotlight on the fallacy of the filibuster. The issue isn't lack of debate. The issue is partisanship that can keep the majority from fulfilling its agenda.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.