Like that's not common. Fans have a special way of seeing the worst in people and very few head coaches are immune.
Two sides to every story.. What I find lacking in the anti-Ty lackeys is an honest argument that's even remotely convincing.
You don't think taking a superior team* (with more preparation) to a worse record is a convincing argument that he's not good? Even if he's just mediocre and not the worst coach in the NBA (which he's not and people that make that argument only hurt a more sensible position), what mediocre coaches win championships?
I already know I'm already preaching to the choir to some degree.
* by practically every account
** at a time where he should be showing significant improvement, and this isn't even citing obvious blunders on an almost nightly basis