Elaborate on this for me. Because, the 2 foot jumper thing seems to be presented in 2 ways.
1-He must learn how to become a 1 foot jumper, but this is extremely hard to learn but physically he can still be explosive doing it. It's just learning the skill is incredibly hard (Learning how to make plays off one foot in the paint.)
2-If you are a 2 foot jumper you are not as athletic as one foot jumpers so you are limited. So Mitchell will rarely show explosion to the basket in the NBA because 2 foot jumpers don't have adequate time to make plays and he is not athletic enough to be a one foot jumper.
So which is it? Perhaps I am misinterpreting the 1st point. Perhaps what people are really implying is that DM is not athletic enough to be a one foot jumper so he will have to learn to finish around the basket/in the paint off one foot with more tricks, anticipation, and skill like say a Steve Nash, Chris Paul, Tony Parker or John Stockton and you'd think since he is as fast and longer he could do this well but learning the skill will be extremely hard and only hall of fame short guys figure it out basically.
So basically Mitchell isn't explosive unless he's jumping off 2 feet so we shouldn't think of him as an elite leaper in the NBA game?
but if we conclude that guys who are 2 foot jumpers are only 2 foot jumpers because they lack the athletic ability to be a 1 foot jumper it doesn't quite make sense when you consider Mitchell had the highest no step vertical. Shouldn't the guys who are elite leapers off one foot have a higher vertical off 2 feet?
Saint CY... Give me God's truth here...