It'd be awesome if some of my questions were answered directly.
See the bolded. These details would certainly affect my judgment of Kobe's statement. In posting that, you've left open the possibility that she did consent (explicitly) to some of the encounter. Did she? If so, at what point does she believe she stopped consenting? Did she resist or say 'no'? Or did she simply stop 'actively' participating (still waiting for some clarification on this)? If the latter, could this not leave room for one to honestly believe there was still implicit/active consent? If so, would this still constitute rape AND would recognition of differences in perception still constitute an admission of guilt?
I'm trying to be very careful about talking about the responsibility of both partners in a sexual encounter. I'm also very sensitive about this issue for a variety of reasons (and not, as JG and others might believe/imply, because I've ever been accused of rape or any other sexual assault).
I don't see how Kobe would have agreed with her assessment of the situation if all she did was stopped actively participating. He would have, in my opinion, said that she is lying, that she consented and never didn't and that her insistence that it was not consensual was untrue. Instead he agreed that she saw the sexual encounter as non-consensual.
So maybe Kobe isn't an English major and he spoke incorrectly. Am I 100% confident I know what happened? No. I know very little about what happened. But what I do know is that she claimed she was raped and Kobe agreed that after looking at the evidence that she "belived" it was not consensual. If he wanted to say she consented to most of the sexual encounter but maybe changed her mind then he should have said that. But that's not what he said.