What's new
By:

The reasons I will no longer make threads that need help from fellow Jazzfanz posters!

franklin said:
Or defense of biased judgeship, depending on which side of the fence you sit. I guess.
Click to expand...

If taking into account all the relevant facts makes me biased then I guess I'm proudly biased.


Apparently? My suggestion was clear. I don't get your motivation for continually attempting to make what I said ambiguous??? I'm going to provide all of it again, in context, and bolding the sections you obviously missed.
Click to expand...

You and I disagree as to how clear your original post was. Obviously you didn't bold the sentence I zeroed in on because it didn't support your thesis.

In any event I understand what you are trying to say now, I just disagree.
 
ClutcH 385 said:
My "editing the quoted comments of another poster and adding your own comments is inappropriate and insulting," according to the PM from the mod.
Click to expand...

If "insulting" comments were infractions, ya woulda thunk 95% of the posters would have been banned by now, ya know?

ClutchH 385 said:
Did you report me you corn ball?
Click to expand...

Safetydan said:
Of course not bra, I love you. In fact I hadn't even looked back at that thread since I posted
Click to expand...

I know for a stonecold fact, from experience, that offense can be "taken" by lame-*** posters on this here site where none was intended or "given." Now I see that "offense" can be given, even if they aint none taken, too, eh?

It don' matter if you're funnin with a guy who don't take no kinda offense to nuthin ya say about him. Someone else will take it FOR him, see?

I guess this is what Franklin would call considering the context, eh? I wonder if any mod ever axxed Dan if he felt "insulted," eh?

moevillini said:
In general, I take a dim view of a poster editing another poster's words, even when it's purely good natured fun.
Click to expand...

This here internet is SERIOUS BIDNIZZ, I tellya! Don't never, NEVER, I SAY, go around kiddin nobuddy or doin nuthin to have fun. It aint allowed round this here joint.
 
To quote the greatest philosopher, sage, and poet of all damn time (John Lee Hooker, naturally)

"Well, my Mama, she didn't low me...Ho, Lawd....

Justa stay out all nite long....

I didn't care what Mama didn't lows....

I would just boogie, anyhowze.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eM3PuXDpKiA
 
Hopper said:
To quote the greatest philosopher, sage, and poet of all damn time (John Lee Hooker, naturally)

"Well, my Mama, she didn't low me...Ho, Lawd....

Justa stay out all nite long....

I didn't care what Mama didn't lows....

I would just boogie, anyhowze.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eM3PuXDpKiA
Click to expand...


exactly what i've been tryna tell these people.
 
sirkickyass said:
Hopper received a fourth infraction and will be suspended for two weeks. His fourth infraction was received as a combination of reports for three separate posts that, in combination, violated the rules on inappropriate content and homosexual slurs.

We are all repressive moderators who just won't give a guy a break you know?
Click to expand...

Just to show ya how plumb stoopid I is, I caint understand if the first two sentences there are supposed to provide evidence for, or against, the last sentence.

Takes some special effort to combine three posts to find an infraction, "in combination," I spoze. Shows ya how diligent the mods is. When Kicky announces, as a matter of fact, that EVERYONE wants me banned, and then I git this the next day, ya know they doin they duty.
 
Hopper said:
"She?" Best watch yo *** there, eh, Vinny? I just gotta suspenion for not lovin trannies.
Click to expand...

I thought I was pretty clear, Slopper. Again, if you've got a problem with me, send me a PM and let me know about it. You've done been told twice.
 
Dan and me, we long-time homeys, eh? Oops, I take that back. Next thang ya know, Dan will be gittin his self infractions if that gits round.
 
Hopper said:
Takes some special effort to combine three posts to find an infraction, "in combination," I spoze.
Click to expand...

Actually we gave you a break. Any of the three could have gotten you an infraction, although they had varying vote levels. If we had given you an infraction for all three or even two of three (my recollection without looking it up was that you were in danger of this) you would have received a permanent ban for getting five infractions. Instead we chose to group three separate reports together and give you a single infraction after one of them hit the necessary level, ending voting on the other posts and eliminating the possibility that you would be permanently banned on the spot.

All said, I am growing weary of constant grousing by those who push the envelope conciously and then act surprised and victimized when they're slapped on the wrist.

Hopper specifically has been warned about backseat moderating and arguing with moderators previously. Given that you truly have zero wiggle room presently sitting on four infractions and five warnings trying to once again litigate publicly may not be the best course of action.
 
Slopper is a victicrat if I've ever seen one. Plays the role of the JF martyr with the best of 'em.
 
Safetydan said:
Reported for pretending to be my friend
Click to expand...

Good work, Danny! I see ya done been learned the basic rule my Mama learned me, eh?

She say: "Hopper-boy, looky here...first rule is don't NEVER fess up to nuthin, and always deny everythang."
 
Kewl!

See that there lil green color up by my handle. It's time aint long. I makin up for lost time fast. This here thread alone done got my *** a crapload of neg rep hits. One guy, he ax:

"Do you seriously not have a grasp of proper spelling and grammar?"

Ya means "seriously" just in a regular kinda way, or duz ya means "garonteed, stonecold, SOLEMNLY serious?"

I caint really answer til I knowz, see?

This here internet is SERIOUS BIDNIZZ, I can tellya that much, right offhand, though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top