Well, we aren't in court, and we don't have to be technical. So we can go off our instincts a little more than usual. None of us are really ever gonna know.
Like I said, it fairly obvious that either Jay or Adnan or both were invloved. We can come to that conclusion because Jay admits as much. No one in there right mind is going to place themselves inside the story just because they feel like making up some crap. Either Jay did it, and he framed Adnan. Or Adnan did it. It's only two choices. With a small possibility that one or more of their friends were invloved also. Nevertheless, one or both was still involved. I think we can safely jump to that conclusion without feeling guilty about whether or not we are being fair. I think that removes a lot of doubt and questions about whether we are on the right trail.
We have two choices. It's either Jay or Adnan.You got a 50/50 shot at guessing which one it is. Everything points to Adnan. Yes, Jay is an idiot, and lied, a lot. Who cares. My instincts tell me it's Adnan. He can't remember where he was during the murder. The call to Nesha. The weird human behavior of not counter blaming Jay. Jay saying it was Adnan. Adnan's motive is simple, he's a butt hurt ex boyfriend, etc....
Ya, it's not exactly evidence. But do we really need a clear cut case to see what's going on here? Who cares that he is well spoken, a good football player, smart, charming, etc... That doesn't mean anything.
This all about the liberal movement to expose racial injustices in the court system. Which I'm all for. But at least pick cases that are actually injustices. Or at least appear to be. This case seems pretty simple imo. I don't know what everyone is so hung up on. Of course you are never going to get a perfectly painted picture when liars, manipulators, and idiots are involved in the story telling. Sometimes, if not most of the time, detectives in murder cases are going to be missing some of the evidence. You might not be able to directly link your suspect.
Maybe, a mistake was made in his conviction in that their technically wasn't enough evidence to convict, but I still think they got the right guy.
This is the part that gets me to conclude that it was Adnan as well. I just don't understand that any human being who is innocent and being fabricated by someone else for a murder would not fight harder to turn the table on the other person. Adnan did NOTHING that I know of to counter Jay's story or even to shift some burden of proof onto Jay. That to me is really puzzling.
The only real explanation for that is that the core of what Jay was telling was the truth. Therefore for me it's still Adnan.