ThisEvans has been better than I expected. That said, I don't see him as an integral piece of the team. Need a PF who is a beast down low to compete against physical players and one who can stretch the floor. Evans is neither. He's a good tweener. I'd say he's a 5th big. Keep him around as the 10th/11th player on the team, but don't overpay.
Evans has proven he can stay in Nba, but only Mr. Corbin can play him over Kanter.
I would like to see Evans playing small forward.
Harry Potter math doesn't work like that. It's much like MMA math. Matt Hughes beat Matt Serra, Matt Serra (although a fluke) beat GSP, and GSP beat Matt Hughes. Sometimes it's all about the matchup and the particular night. Maybe Snape was off his game?1. Evans is underrated! and he plays hard. period.
and
2. I HAVE A QUESTION SIR.
how did lord Voldemort get beat by harry when harry got destroyed by snape? AND VOLDEMORT OWNED SNAPE IN LIKE 1 WAND WAVE.
HOW?!
1. Evans is underrated! and he plays hard. period.
and
2. I HAVE A QUESTION SIR.
how did lord Voldemort get beat by harry when harry got destroyed by snape? AND VOLDEMORT OWNED SNAPE IN LIKE 1 WAND WAVE.
HOW?!
Harry Potter math doesn't work like that. It's much like MMA math. Matt Hughes beat Matt Serra, Matt Serra (although a fluke) beat GSP, and GSP beat Matt Hughes. Sometimes it's all about the matchup and the particular night. Maybe Snape was off his game?
Harry Potter math doesn't work like that. It's much like MMA math. Matt Hughes beat Matt Serra, Matt Serra (although a fluke) beat GSP, and GSP beat Matt Hughes. Sometimes it's all about the matchup and the particular night. Maybe Snape was off his game?
Harry got destroyed by Snape? This is news to me. Even if he had, this guy sums it up pretty well:
Not to mention, the only time that Snape ever really went after Harry was when he was still green as a student with very little in the way of magical education.
Voldemorts wand was serving a different master at the end DUUHHHHH!!
on the app. square bizness.
So, Mr. Thee Jazz Fan, not so long ago you ardently and, to use a euphemism, not so tactfully informed me that Jeremy Evans could never be a 4th big in the NBA, largely due to his light frame. Due to the... Egregious (?) manner in which you pursued and carried out your devices, I happily wish to inform you that it appears you are wrong. The numbers seem to support the ludicrous and repugnant notion that Jeremy can indeed be a 4th big (10 to 15 minutes a night?) in the NBA. His PER is currently 18.3 which is the highest on the team (not saying he's the best player on the team and I understand that it is in limited minutes but we are talking 4th big right?) and he is shooting 53% from the field. Additionally, he has flashed signs of a competent jump shot. Indeed, he has been fairly impressive at times and it would seem his physical tools, his amazingly quick second jump, as well as his sheer athleticism makes up for, in part, his light frame, and I would argue that his weaknesses are generally only accentuated when he is playing against 1st unit guys. Luckily, we are only talking 4th big material here. Feel free to kick against the pricks but,were I to be honest, I would find it infinitely more impressive were you to simply convey the faint idea that perhaps you were wrong. After all, the Jury is just mostly not out anymore.
https://jazzfanz.com/showthread.php?15649-Jeremy-Evans-Our-4th-Big-of-the-future
Evans is a boss. For sure a great 4th big.
Yeah, he will get owned every now and then. Jordan Hill had him last night in the post. Those same bigs have trouble boxing out Evans or guarding his jump shot. Would love to see Evans extend his range to the 3pt line.