And the Jazz said no according to him?
According to Tony Jones the Jazz weren't willing to include a first round pick and that's why the deal never happened.
And the Jazz said no according to him?
Tony Jones, Tony Jones, and Tony Jones. Same reason why we’re currently talking about Harris.What I would like to know is how do you know there wasnt anyone talking to Favors last year? And how do you know he was in trade talks the last 3 years? Cause you read it on the internets? Or are you some kind of psychic that knows all? You sound like you have insider knowledge. Tell us who you really are?
Are you talking about the year when Favors was injured for basically the entirety of it?Lineup data suggest that we were better with Joe Johnson and Gobert on the floor together when Johnson was here than Gobert and Favors. Johnson wasn't any good on D but our defense was still fine when he was on the floor and our offense was much better. And Tobias is much better than Johnson was at that stage of his career.
Tony Jones, Tony Jones, and Tony Jones. Same reason why we’re currently talking about Harris.
Regardless, you all are significantly missing the point of the question by intentionally getting lost on the nuance of each point. I am not definitively saying Harris is better, or that the value around the league is what the smoke says. I’m simply stating that all that smoke, all that smoke saying how Harris is valued, and all that lack of smoke defining Favors’ value, that the smoke shouldn’t define our decisions but it should absolutely give us cause to ask questions. People immediately jumping on the defensive to argue that the smoke doesn’t significantly favor a much larger perceived value around the league for Harris over Favors are being completely disingenuous, willfully ignorant, or both.
You should read my posts again because I went out of my way to make that point multiple times.I would value Harris over Favors for out team. I think the league would value Harris over Favors as well. But I also think what the league values them at shouldnt really weigh on the Jazz that much. They should get the players that help them win. Values can change quickly in the NBA.
I dont know why you are assuming I am disagreeing with you.You should read my posts again because I went out of my way to make that point multiple times.
If we miss out on Tobias due to Conley's albatross, it's a pretty big fail by management.
Because I’m referencing perceived value as a source for questioning, and people seem offended and are getting lost on arguing about that perceived value without acknowledging at all the abstract question, and the overall point of my argument.I dont know why you are assuming I am disagreeing with you.
Nah man... I been team Harris for a long time... Yall acting like this a Rich Paul situation with AD (Lakers or nothing) and 90% of you don't understand the cap or our situation.
Sorry to throw cold water on this but this ain't 2k... wipe the Cheeto crumbs off your chest and put down the controller.
Yep, a PG that can shoot and create was a much much bigger need for the team than another PF.Conley makes us a better team than Harris does. So no, not a big fail.
One thing we can all agree on and be certain of is that Harris would play more than the 23.2 minutes per game that favors played last yearI heavily disagree.
Also better with Crowder and gobert than favors and gobert.Lineup data suggest that we were better with Joe Johnson and Gobert on the floor together when Johnson was here than Gobert and Favors. Johnson wasn't any good on D but our defense was still fine when he was on the floor and our offense was much better. And Tobias is much better than Johnson was at that stage of his career.
You could look at last year too but replace jj with CrowderAre you talking about the year when Favors was injured for basically the entirety of it?
Conley makes us a better team than Harris does.
A. Not just another pf. A power forward who can shoot and create.Yep, a PG that can shoot and create was a much much bigger need for the team than another PF.
Except that when Gobert and Favors played with a PG that could shoot that data flipped. Crazy that people dont see how big of an issue Rubio was. When Mitchell or Neto was PG Favors/Gobert combo was better than Gobert/Crowder.Also better with Crowder and gobert than favors and gobert.
Crazy to me that some people still don't get it
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
A. Not just another pf. A power forward who can shoot and create.
B. A point who can shoot and create is easier to find than a power forward who can. It's kind of in the job description for a point guard. The jazz just stupidly decided to get one who couldn't shoot in the trade for Rubio.
In fact, I believe Mitchell can shoot and create.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Except that when Gobert and Favors played with a PG that could shoot that data flipped. Crazy that people dont see how big of an issue Rubio was.