What's new

Trump call CNN fake news at press conference. Denies question. Hilarious!

More personal attacks rather than actual dialog! I'm shocked utterly shocked
ok you want dialog here you have it! lets see how you repsond
you work from a different "set" of facts


OBama treated the press much worse in his 8 years.
you don't care, because the fake news you watch did/does not report on Obama's misgiving!!!!!!!!


the same press who claims Obummer has a "scandal free administration". yet his administration is RIDDLED with scandals.


so please spare me this hubbub. and swallow the redpill andresearch obamas treatment of the press who did/does not suck up to him.
while your at it look at the press lies about scandal free administration.
want some scandals?

-benghazi
-e-mails
-fast and furious
-IRS targeting of conservative groups
-The DOJ seized Associated Press phone records as well as phone and email records from Fox News reporter James Rosen. (worse than claling cnn fake news)
-Ransom for iran hostages and lied about it.


there are lots more.
soo there is your dialogue!!!!!!!!!!
 
SAUCE: https://townhall.com/columnists/cal...ia-forget-how-obama-treated-fox-news-n2270406

December 2010

After the Democrats’ midterm election shellacking, President Obama reportedly told labor leaders in a private meeting that Fox News was partly responsible for him “losing white males” who tune into the network to “hear Obama is a Muslim 24/7.”

He needed someone to blame for the massive losses because the next election was his.

September 2013

Obama went after Fox News on the campaign trail for his health care law.

“If you’ve talked to somebody who said, ‘Well, I don’t know, I was watching Fox News and they said this is horrible,’ you can say, ‘you know what? Don’t take my word for it! Go on the website.”

February 2014

During a pre-Super Bowl interview, President Obama suggested Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly was being unfair for asking questions about ObamaCare’s shortcomings, the IRS scandal and Benghazi.

Because, as Obama’s longtime adviser Valerie Jarrett said in a recent CNN interview, “The president prides himself on the fact that his administration hasn’t had a scandal and he hasn’t done something to embarrass himself…” Yes, she really said that.

October 2014

President Obama insisted ObamaCare is “working pretty well in the real world” despite it being a “fanged threat to freedom on Fox News” in a speech at Northwestern University.

Nevermind the painful costs it’s incurring now, and the fact that Democrats can’t defend it to save Obama’s legacy.

September 2016

At a Clinton fundraiser in New York City, President Obama predicted a close election “not because of Hillary’s flaws,” but because of Fox News and some blogs “that are churning out a lot of misinformation…”

Which brings us to our final whopper from the president:

November 2016

After Trump’s successful win on election day, Obama blamed Fox News for Democrats losing elections because of “Fox News in every bar and restaurant in big chunks of the country.”

Time and time again, Obama used the bully pulpit to blame Fox News for his losses, but the mainstream media didn’t come alongside Fox.


there is more, on campaign trail he kicked 2 reporters of his plane, forgot from which outlet they where(not fox).

SO YEAH, here is your dialog!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Could you imagine what would've happened to obama if he had acted that same way to a Fox News reporter? He would've been lynched!

Could you have imagined what would have happened to Fox News if they ran a similar story and then tried to interrupt Obama about 8 different times when he was trying to call on someone else? My suspicion is we wouldn't get past the Fox News reporter's behavior to have any concern on what Obama's response was.
 
I like Alex Jones, despite the health products he sells--

all u need to know about Alex Jones, really


--


To those in a huff about "fake news", care to provide links to publications, or organizations that consistently report on "not fake" news?
 
all u need to know about Alex Jones, really


--


To those in a huff about "fake news", care to provide links to publications, or organizations that consistently report on "not fake" news?

Watch this and try and tell me they don't just make **** up as they go along. They can't even admit it was Hillary on the tape even though they actually reported on the story before. Thats blatant lying and misleading information.

[video=youtube_share;R4HZLItAeh0]https://youtu.be/R4HZLItAeh0
 
Could you have imagined what would have happened to Fox News if they ran a similar story and then tried to interrupt Obama about 8 different times when he was trying to call on someone else? My suspicion is we wouldn't get past the Fox News reporter's behavior to have any concern on what Obama's response was.

Its just getting out of control how stupid and hypocritical the left is being right now. Its despicable. Its a ****ing joke. Its an insult to anyone with even average intelligence. But I guess they are doubling down on making the dumbest people in America the foundation for their base. They must believe that those are enough numbers for them to remain relevant. I think its going to continue to backfire on them though. You cant continue to control and manipulate people with all the different available sources of opinions and news. Which is mainly the young and dumb who they aim to influence. Thats why you see mainly kids in the streets rioting and breaking ****. Bunch of dumb asses who dont know ****.
 
It still blows my mind that anyone believes a polygraph tells you anything of value. It has been shown again and again ad nauseum that they are insanely unreliable, total ********, yet they are actually still used and believed. Mind-boggling. This is almost as bad as those who question the existence of His Noodliness.
 
It still blows my mind that anyone believes a polygraph tells you anything of value. It has been shown again and again ad nauseum that they are insanely unreliable, total ********, yet they are actually still used and believed. Mind-boggling. This is almost as bad as those who question the existence of His Noodliness.

Ya I dont get that either.Even when I was a kid I didn't believe they worked. I have never believed they work. Its one of the most stupid cons ever. Only a fool would take one. Because when you know they don't work you very likely could get nervous and scared just from the thought of getting nervous and it indicating a false positive.
 
They're trying to get Trump supporters back?

Do you ever wonder why so many people start out Liberal and then turn conservative as they get older?

Dont believe that to be true? Why is it that when there are protests they consist of so many young people? And why are most protests for liberal causes?

Do you think the average 20 year old knows more about life and the world than the average 40 year old? Who do you think is more likely to commit crimes, 20 year olds or 40 year olds? Who is more likely of the two to cause mischief and chaos in general? Notice a pattern here?

Im not saying this is a perfect definition of the two groups, but there is certainly something to it. Sometimes young people know something older people don't, and sometimes older people are wrong. Sometimes those protests aren't just about the age differences, but there certainly is a pattern to it. Such as young people often get duped into believing stupid **** and causing problems in the name of it.

So to answer the question, no I wouldn't put the intelligence of a bunch of kids over a bunch of adults.

Voting Deomographics. Pew research

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/behind-trumps-victory-divisions-by-race-gender-education/

Clinton received a lower share of the vote among young voters (ages 18-29) than Obama received in 2012 or 2008. Young adults preferred Clinton over Trump by a wide 55%-37% margin; by comparison, Obama had a 60%-36% advantage over Romney in 2012 and a 66%-32% advantage over McCain in 2008.
 
Do you ever wonder why so many people start out Liberal and then turn conservative as they get older?

Dont believe that to be true? Why is it that when there are protests they consist of so many young people? And why are most protests for liberal causes?

Do you think the average 20 year old knows more about life and the world than the average 40 year old? Who do you think is more likely to commit crimes, 20 year olds or 40 year olds? Who is more likely of the two to cause mischief and chaos in general? Notice a pattern here?

Im not saying this is a perfect definition of the two groups, but there is certainly something to it. Sometimes young people know something older people don't, and sometimes older people are wrong. Sometimes those protests aren't just about the age differences, but there certainly is a pattern to it. Such as young people often get duped into believing stupid **** and causing problems in the name of it.

So to answer the question, no I wouldn't put the intelligence of a bunch of kids over a bunch of adults.

Voting Deomographics. Pew research

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/behind-trumps-victory-divisions-by-race-gender-education/

1) Probably because the older one gets, the more one is opposed to change, and conservatism by nature is opposed to change.

2) Protests tend to be against the staus quo. It makes sense since if one believes in the status quo, why would they protest it.

3) Depends on the 40 year old. I've seen enough incompetence from 40 year olds, especially from the government, that it is becoming irrelevant at this point. As for crime, of course it's the 20 year olds. What's your point, that younger people commit crimes? No ****. At least violent crimes. Crime takes energy. The older generation is better at crimes that involve theft. Bernie Madoff wasn't a 20 year old.

And from your same link:

College graduates backed Clinton by a 9-point margin (52%-43%), while those without a college degree backed Trump 52%-44%. This is by far the widest gap in support among college graduates and non-college graduates in exit polls dating back to 1980.

While I'd put the intelligence of adults over kids, the intelligence of the average Trump voter isn't all that awe inspiring.
 
1) Probably because the older one gets, the more one is opposed to change, and conservatism by nature is opposed to change.

2) Protests tend to be against the staus quo. It makes sense since if one believes in the status quo, why would they protest it.

3) Depends on the 40 year old. I've seen enough incompetence from 40 year olds, especially from the government, that it is becoming irrelevant at this point. As for crime, of course it's the 20 year olds. What's your point, that younger people commit crimes? No ****. At least violent crimes. Crime takes energy. The older generation is better at crimes that involve theft. Bernie Madoff wasn't a 20 year old.

And from your same link:

College graduates backed Clinton by a 9-point margin (52%-43%), while those without a college degree backed Trump 52%-44%. This is by far the widest gap in support among college graduates and non-college graduates in exit polls dating back to 1980.

While I'd put the intelligence of adults over kids, the intelligence of the average Trump voter isn't all that awe inspiring.

Life wisdom and academics are two different things. General intelligence and academics are two different things. I have met many smart people with no education, and many dumb people with an education, and vice versa. They don't teach you how to not be a fool in school. In fact they probabaly hope you are somewhat of a fool so that its easier to indoctrinate you.

Im not saying college is bad, but it certainly doesn't automatically make someone more qualified to vote for president than someone who hasn't been., Also, someone who is in their early 20's still has a lot to learn about life, and maturing to do, even if they have a degree. Sometimes things you learn early in life dont hit home til you are older and you get to see first hand what the real meaning was after it has sunk in all the way. Someone can walk around with all sorts of information in their head but still not really know what a lot of it really means or how to use it properly. You rarely hear people say they were smarter in their 20's. Age is a better general gauge for smarts. At least when it comes to life Wisdom, which has more to do with voting for president considering you pretty much are guessing anyways.

Would you trust a pilot more that has been flying the same plane for 30 years, and never read anything about it, or a kid who got a degree reading how to fly the plane but never flew before in his life?
 
"In fact they probabaly hope you are somewhat of a fool so that its easier to indoctrinate you."

Yes, "T.H.E.Y.". Those Hoping to Enslave You!

There are meetings, branch presidents, bake sales. It's a full blown attempt directed at indoctrinating our youth. All for the purpose of enslaving us. If you don't already know, let me tell you, there is a large minority of the world's population that is actively working to enslave the majority of the world's population. It might be hard to imagine why they see an enslaved world as preferable to a free one, but I can clear that issue up real quick, they have fallen under Satan's spell. They have eaten the forbidden fruit and will stop at nothing to destroy good God-fearing people wherever they may be.
 
It still blows my mind that anyone believes a polygraph tells you anything of value. It has been shown again and again ad nauseum that they are insanely unreliable, total ********, yet they are actually still used and believed. Mind-boggling. This is almost as bad as those who question the existence of His Noodliness.

or tht fingerprints are unique. like seriously 6 billion people alive at the moment. they have 10 fingers. so 60.billion fingerprints at the moment. so each and everyone of those is unique although they have limited permutations. yeah right
 
Yes, "T.H.E.Y.". Those Hoping to Enslave You!

There are meetings, branch presidents, bake sales. It's a full blown attempt directed at indoctrinating our youth. All for the purpose of enslaving us. If you don't already know, let me tell you, there is a large minority of the world's population that is actively working to enslave the majority of the world's population. It might be hard to imagine why they see an enslaved world as preferable to a free one, but I can clear that issue up real quick, they have fallen under Satan's spell. They have eaten the forbidden fruit and will stop at nothing to destroy good God-fearing people wherever they may be.

Haha. You know, your insults might be more effective if you could actually hit a soft spot. Your aim sucks. I don't know why you keep throwing the religion bit at me. IM NOT RELIGIOUS. How many times do I have to tell you? Miss, you have not hit my battleship.

My statememt makes perfect sense if you accept that liberals professors want to get you to believe in liberals things, in other words "indoctrinate you". It doesn't take a grand conspiracy for a bunch of people to try and push for the same thing. They can do that all on their own. You know, what you do. Are you part of a conspiracy?

I know, terribly complicated to understand. Hopefully that clears it up this time.
 
Last edited:
all u need to know about Alex Jones, really


--


To those in a huff about "fake news", care to provide links to publications, or organizations that consistently report on "not fake" news?

No answers yet. Shocking.
 
Yes, "T.H.E.Y.". Those Hoping to Enslave You!

There are meetings, branch presidents, bake sales. It's a full blown attempt directed at indoctrinating our youth. All for the purpose of enslaving us. If you don't already know, let me tell you, there is a large minority of the world's population that is actively working to enslave the majority of the world's population. It might be hard to imagine why they see an enslaved world as preferable to a free one, but I can clear that issue up real quick, they have fallen under Satan's spell. They have eaten the forbidden fruit and will stop at nothing to destroy good God-fearing people wherever they may be.

What do you think the government is doing when they take your tax dollars an ILLEGALLY advertise to you? Indoctrination.
Who owns the government? The lawyers who use them to advance there agendas. Who owns this lawyers? The rich an wealthy cartel families. Who writes the laws? Lawyers an bought off politicians in DC.

They do not need some grand cabal only money to grease pockets from several angles. The activist SJW groups do not realize it is the Illuminati funding them.
 
Back
Top