What's new
By:

Utah Jazz VS Portland Blazers -- Tue. Oct. 25th @8pm MDT

tleikheen said:
its not fair to think GHill can keep producing points when he hasn't done it throughout his career ,he plays a great overall game but not a game where he's the point scorer
Click to expand...

Its not fair to play him 39 minutes in the first game of the season. We had plenty of solid players to give him a break to keep him fresh for the 4th.
 
Broncster said:
I would have taken 8 minutes from Hill and given it to Exum. Exum played well in the second half in limited minutes. Hill looked worn out and really forcing things in the 4th. I also would have given Exum 5+ of Macks minutes. Exums defense is much better than Macks and I dont think the offense would have been a drop off. I am worried about Exum getting minutes when Hayward and Burk are back. Maybe Jazz want to show case Mack a little?
Click to expand...

Exum should get all of Mack's minutes. He was horrid. I hope we trade his ***.
 
framer said:
Actually I think Snyder was challenging Exum a little. If he doesn't go to the hole, he isn't going to play. When he got back in he went to the hole. I suspect he eats Mack's minutes on Friday.
Click to expand...
Mack had a play where he completely left Crabbe open for a wide open 3. He got pulled from the game right after. That play was a huge part of that run the Blazers went on in the early 4th quarter.
 
Also, I think that is as good a game as Portland can give. Everything went their way and we were right there without perfection.
 
7 points
5 rebounds

That is what our PF's gave us tonight. Jesus Christ this game is on Lyles and Diaw.
 
framer said:
Actually I think Snyder was challenging Exum a little. If he doesn't go to the hole, he isn't going to play. When he got back in he went to the hole. I suspect he eats Mack's minutes on Friday.
Click to expand...

So he benched him after 3 minutes of going to the hole and scoring twice in a row and being aggressive? If he was challenging him then dont bench him for doing what you want.
 
lol @ the overreactions.

We lost a close game on the road against a really good team that was on fire without two of our best players.
 
Stifle Tower said:
Different year, same old ****.
Lillard going off and Quin plays Mack instead of Exum? Why did we get rid of Corbin?
Unless Mack is being traded, this makes no sense. I'm about to change my name to QuinBegone.
Click to expand...

Down Stifle, down.
 
Actually I think Snyder was challenging Exum a little. If he doesn't go to the hole, he isn't going to play. When he got back in he went to the hole. I suspect he eats Mack's minutes on Friday.
Click to expand...

there's some truth to this
 
r_u_s_t_b_u_c_k_e_t said:
c'mon man. he had a terrible rookie year and then missed all of last season with a devastating injury. just be glad he had a few good plays tonight. maybe there is hope.
Click to expand...
Terrible rookie year? Not even close, WTF were you watching. As the starter our team was better than without him.
 
NAOS said:
Lillard is a top-5 offensive player. Maybe even top-3. And he's ****ing focused, man.

Losses will hurt this year. I think we win this with Favors in the lineup. ****.
Click to expand...

Diaw and withey were gawd awful... replace their minutes with favs and we are in business.

Also friggin Portland shot 68% from three... Noah vonleh went 5 for 5 looking like snoop dog out there. I was encouraged by most of what I saw honestly.

I need less diaw though... even with favors out I need less diaw. Lyles needed to play more even though he sucked tonight too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top