What's new

Weather Network ****s on Breitbart climate article

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 848
  • Start date Start date
I'm not intrigued.

and even if it wasnt a myth the answer is to green the earth. not all this carbon tax, and the anti human policy agendas of the UN

do you hate plants?
plants eat breathe co2. the answer to co2 is simple. plant more ****ing trees. green the sahara desert.



this climate change hysteria, it is a simple Kansas city shuffle. everybody is looking at co2. while there are REAL horrors going on in the environment. we should invest this time and money spent on "man-made climate change" on real climate issues. co2 is not polution, unlike real polutants we are releasing in our envoriment.

so i don't give a **** whether you are intrigued or not.



the climate has been changing forever.


CO2 is AWESOME

roll coal all day long bro
 
and by the way the sicence is not settled.
climate modeling method is not settled science. so far all climate models man made since "OMG global cooling era" have failed. none of em came true.



when climate change liars come up with real science not based on climate models, then we can say the science is settled.



isn't it ironic every single climate change model FAILED. yet we keep using the same stupid modeling method, and claim the science is settled. THIS IS LUNACY


the climate is always changing thats what climate does.
 
Last edited:
I am not a proponent of crawling backwards, dutch. I believe to solve this we need to move forwards, which means the solution is a technological one that doesn't involve us giving up our modern lifestyle. I don't think the green movement is in any way realistic or meaningful. It's a lot of feel good ********* that will never get us where we need to be.

I'm open to the idea that global worming is a catastrophe, but I'm also open to the idea that we can manage a warmer planet. I think planning for a warmer planet is time better spent than working to cool our planet back down.
 
As an aside, I also think that once we understand how we warmed up Earth we can apply that knowledge to warming up Mars. Boom, humans winning!
 
Lol.
Trees require water. Lol

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using JazzFanz mobile app

I KNOW THAT.

guess you never heard of desert greening. israel has done it succesfully. but yeah liberals dont know anything about nature!


gheez

Desert greening is the process of man-made reclamation of deserts for ecological reasons (biodiversity), farming and forestry, but also for reclamation of natural water systems and other Life support systems. It is done by various methods. So far only arid and semi-arid desert are meant when using the expression. Icy deserts are considered unsuitable. Desert greening is an important topic as it can help solve global water, energy, and food crises. It pertains to roughly 32 million square kilometres of land.

according to wikipedia. if co2 overload is a serious problem. desert greening is a real live solution!
 
Liberals know nuthin. Warmer climate means more water everywhere it is like a rainforest effect go take a look at dinosaur times you think that hot *** planet could feed those beasts without tons more vegetation an no deserts?
Lol
 
so why you lolling? i think you owe me an apology.


lets say co2 is harmfull wich i am saying it is not.

wouldnt greening deserts fix the problem a helluva lot more that taxing the **** out of carbon?
I lol'd at boris. I understand why you think it was at you though. Alts can be confusing
 
This is why the conversation should always be about cutting pollution and improving air and water quality. It's something everyone agree's on and it solves all mentioned problems by getting us off fossil fuels.

Unless there is a dumbass still out there that thinks we shouldn't invest in renewable energy to cut pollution?!
 
This is why the conversation should always be about cutting pollution and improving air and water quality. It's something everyone agree's on and it solves all mentioned problems by getting us off fossil fuels.

Unless there is a dumbass still out there that thinks we shouldn't invest in renewable energy to cut pollution?!
well we should not get totally of fossil fuels, because trees and mother nature need C02.


there are real hazardous things happening to mother nature, but you all have been brainwahsed that it is CO2 the big culprit!


we will get off of fossil fuels when free market principles makes renewable cheaper.



and the fact that every single climate model failed so far(thank god some where apocalyptic as ****), should be a sign that signs is not settled.

climate models are just a guess. a complex guess on a far more complex issue, that scientist fail to understand so far
 
well we should not get totally of fossil fuels, because trees and mother nature need C02.

we will get off of fossil fuels when free market principles makes renewable cheaper.

These are the two dumbest statements I have ever read.

#1- Pretty sure plants and animals existed and thrived before humans started pumping C02 into the air. In fact I believe animals and plants existed before humans.....

#2 Oil and Gas are GREATLY subsidized by US taxpayers to keep costs low. Around 5 Billion per year.

Do your homework bro.
 
These are the two dumbest statements I have ever read.

#1- Pretty sure plants and animals existed and thrived before humans started pumping C02 into the air. In fact I believe animals and plants existed before humans.....

#2 Oil and Gas are GREATLY subsidized by US taxpayers to keep costs low. Around 5 Billion per year.

Do your homework bro.


ok so far every single climate prediction failed. i will jsut sit back and watch "global cooling, or was it global warming ooh wait it is man made climate change" fail again and again and again and again.

wise up man. lets focus on real ecological dangers
 
ok so far every single climate prediction failed. i will jsut sit back and watch "global cooling, or was it global warming ooh wait it is man made climate change" fail again and again and again and again.

wise up man. lets focus on real ecological dangers


Waters are rising, it's a fact. Right now an iceberg the size of Deleware is about to break off. If this keep happening large coastal cities will be underwater: https://www.theverge.com/2016/11/29/13780410/antarctica-glacier-ice-sheet-melting-sea-level-rising


Or what about the die off in the Great Barrier Reef because of warm ocean waters? https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/dec/09/great-barrier-reef-not-likely-to-survive-if-warming-trend-continues-says-report

This effects of are happening now and your option won't change facts.

Your opinion < Facts
 
Back
Top