https://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/53998997-78/store-police-purvis-apparently.html.csp#disqus_thread
Concealed carry saves more lives.
Concealed carry saves more lives.
Wanting to ban guns is just about as irrational as being against gay marriage. I'm sure Lundegarrd is pissed about this article, they should have used their fists of fury and or nunchucks.
Wanting to ban guns is just about as irrational as being against gay marriage. I'm sure Lundegarrd is pissed about this article, they should have used their fists of fury and or nunchucks.
https://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/53998997-78/store-police-purvis-apparently.html.csp#disqus_thread
Concealed carry saves more lives.
Wanting to ban guns is just about as irrational as being against gay marriage. I'm sure Lundegarrd is pissed about this article, they should have used their fists of fury and or nunchucks.
"This message is hidden because jimmy eat jazz is on your ignore list."
If this is anything like the posts I read before the ingore feature came into play then damn that feature is worth its weight in gold.
Awesome story. Drugs are illegal but people still get them. What makes you think banning guns will be any different? If anything more stuff like this would happen. I don't go into businesses that have a sign that says "No Guns Allowed" Why not put up a sign that says "Robbers, come in and run a muck noone is going to stop you." I'm not going into one of those places and get caught with my pants down when someone decides to rob it.
Awesome story. Drugs are illegal but people still get them. What makes you think banning guns will be any different? If anything more stuff like this would happen. I don't go into businesses that have a sign that says "No Guns Allowed" Why not put up a sign that says "Robbers, come in and run a muck noone is going to stop you." I'm not going into one of those places and get caught with my pants down when someone decides to rob it.
Not that anyone would every generalize from a sample size of one.
Guns do, however, harm people, and the rate of gun violence in the US is quite high. Concern about how concealed carry laws affect the likelihood/incidence of gun violence does not strike me as irrational but rather seems to be to be a legitimate concern. A matter, I think, that is best resolved with evidence than with ideology. (I have no idea what the actual evidence is, though I'd guess it varies depending on who's presenting it and the biases they bring to the table.)
What makes you think banning guns will be any different?
Not only did the man with the cc permit save two lives, he did so without discharging his firearm.
By "more lives" I meant two, as in the number of stabbing victims in this story.
I completely disagree on the ideology part. I'm not interested in arguing the evidence end either, but if you're really interested then you'll be hard pressed to prove guns = higher violence. Americans are more violent than many of our OECD peers but trying to correlate the violence to guns has not only proved futile but it's irrational as a hypothesis. It's actually comical to start arguing guns means violence in a thread about a violent knife attack.
Anyway, this thread is about racism and not guns.
There's no reason to even frame the discussion in such an irrelevant way. Violent people don't need guns to be violent, as illustrated in this article. Ban guns and those who want to commit a violent crime will do it another way. The majority of them already are.
True, violent people don't need guns to be violent, but the fact that they have guns would seem to me to risk increasing the lethality of that violence. I would guess it does increase the risk and the incidence of lethal violence, but then I'm just guessing.