The Thriller
Well-Known Member
False.
Why don't you look up the latest data produced by the utahfoundation?
https://www.utahfoundation.org/img/pdfs/rr680.pdf
WHAT HAPPENED TO UTAH’S EDUCATION PAR ADOX?
Over the past ten years, Utah Foundation has published a number
of reports on public education funding. Several of these reports
explained “Utah’s education paradox” which was that Utah spent
a higher proportion of personal income on K-12 public education
than most other states while also spending less per pupil than any
other state in the nation. This gap was largely explained by Utah’s
unique demographic makeup; with very high birth rates and a very
young population, there were many school aged children. During
the education paradox years (up to the mid-1990s), Utah’s funding
effort ranked in the top ten nationally, but state demographics caused
low per-pupil spending.
However, by the late 1990s and early 2000s the paradox lessened
as the funding effort slowed. The 2006 report showed that Utah’s
education paradox no longer existed. Utah was still last in the nation
for per-pupil spending, but funding effort was no longer remarkable,
having fallen to around the national average.
Utah's demographics are a contributing factor. However, the paradox doesn't exist anymore since spending in education has been diverted to other programs.
I think it's pretty obvious that Utah's legislation has a pro-private/charter school agenda. Make no mistake, there is a strong lobby to divert money from public education and into the coffers of special interest.
So nice job picking out data gameface to promote your opinion. Try using updated data. And try letting facts form your opinions, not pick out outdated information to conform to your opinion.