What's new

Youngkin Wins.

How do you get 60% of the voters were "growing up" in the 50's and 60's? Do you know how to Math? The demographic you used has 50-64 y/o's in the same. How many 50 y/o's were born in 1950's and 60's moron?

I think we're done here.
You should try reading the chart provided.
 
Are you truly so ignorant that you don't know white supremacists have a long history of supporting minority people who have supported them?
I'm sure Hispanic voters will come rushing back to the not-at-all-racist Progressive caucus after voting 55% for Youngkin versus 45% for McAuliffe now that Progressives have labeled them "white supremacists". It is strange they ever left the Progressive caucus given the outreach where Progressives labeled their native language as bigoted and demand they identify themselves as Latinx rather than Lantina or Latino. I do remember how you said you heard a Latinx on NPR who spoke for all Latinx when saying how much they enjoyed being corrected on language by their moral betters in the Progressive caucus.

I will say that with the new Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, and majority of Hispanic voters in Virginia, it is nice to see how diverse and accepting the white supremacists of Virginia have become.
 
You should try reading the chart provided.
And onto the block list you go. Gave you another chance and you blew it.

This is why we can't ever discuss anything beyond the surface. There's a certain level of vulnerability that one needs to show. Instead, you refuse to do that, refuse to be open to learning about facts, and maintain living in your alt universe. Sad

Isn't it amazing how folks drowning in right wing disinformation keep this country stuck in first gear? Whether it's covid/vaccines, health care, economics, election "fraud", LGBT community, or race? Sigh
 
I read it. You obviously don't know simple mathematics or understand how to read it.

Your claim of 60% of the population who voted in Virginia yesterday growing up in the 50's-60's was false.

Moron
How so?

Here's the electorate breakdown.

If you were born in 1950 you'd be 71 this year and in the 26 percent category. If you were born in 1960, you'd be 61 this year and in the 34 percent category.

Basic math, 34+26=60. The next closest demo is those 40-49 years of age, but they only constitute 18 percent of the electorate. Overwhelmingly Boomers still make up the largest part of our electorate. Boomers grew up with segregation. This shouldn't be a surprise to you.

Do you not know how to read these things?

Screen Shot 2021-11-03 at 12.58.04 PM.png
 
075FC40B-AAC2-4D34-84CD-95C91B85248A.jpegI seriously doubt it ; but I'm hoping the VA Gov race finally puts an end to the democratic party trotting out these old, milquetoast, middle of the road, centrist, Clinton-like candidates.

You need a more compelling reason to win an election other than "I'm not a republican; but don't worry I'll just kinda act like one once I get into office."
You have plenty of agreement there
 
I would just add that I'm a firm believer in that I think children and young adults should learn both sides of many debates and conflicts so they can inform their own opinions vs. being scripted. Any echo chamber where a person only hears one side of the story is destined to believe that it's the only truth.

And yeah, there's not a lot of good reasons for something such as the Holocaust, but people need to understand what brought us to that point in history and how it became a thing rather than it simply just being 'bad' per se.

Adults sure seem to care about CRT a lot more than kids do as they'd rather be playing Xbox, hanging out with friends or trying to impress the opposite sex in embarrassing ways - and we all know it because we were young once.
 
How so?

Here's the electorate breakdown.

If you were born in 1950 you'd be 71 this year and in the 26 percent category. If you were born in 1960, you'd be 61 this year and in the 34 percent category.

Basic math, 34+26=60. The next closest demo is those 40-49 years of age, but they only constitute 18 percent of the electorate. Overwhelmingly Boomers still make up the largest part of our electorate. Boomers grew up with segregation. This shouldn't be a surprise to you.

Do you not know how to read these things?

View attachment 11336
Once again....Your claim, that 60% of those who voted yesterday grew up in the 50's and 60's is false. When was someone who is 51 in Virginia born? I'll help you, they were born in 70 or 71, therefore could not have grown up in the 50's and 60's making your moronic claim false. Even if someone is 55, that would make them born in 67 or 68. Does someone who is 2 years old "grow up" in 68-69....moron
 
Suggesting teachers read books that are about CRT does not equal teaching CRT. Like not even a little bit. It's good to see that teachers are being encouraged to learn...
There is a school system, there is CRT, and there is learning but there is no teaching. The school system is involved in getting people to learn CRT but that facilitation of learning by the school system can't be called teaching. I'm not saying you're wrong or right but it is an interesting concept to play with where lines are being drawn.
 
I'm sure Hispanic voters will come rushing back to the not-at-all-racist Progressive caucus after voting 55% for Youngkin versus 45% for McAuliffe now that Progressives have labeled them "white supremacists".
How completely unresponsive.

It is strange they ever left the Progressive caucus given the outreach where Progressives labeled their native language as bigoted and demand they identify themselves as Latinx rather than Lantina or Latino.
Of course. By and large, the Hispanic community is very conservative.
 
Did the sentence that I quoted use the term "white supremacist"? If not, why did you connect them?
I'm trying to figure out where you are going with your point of connecting the voting preferences of the majority of Hispanic voters in Virginia to white supremacy.
 
Since CRT isn't part of the curriculum in VA schools, what would you call the message being sent that he's going to ban something that isn't even being done and isn't being pushed as a K-12 subject?
It is easier to prevent implementation than it is to remove it after implementation.
 
This is not intended as a challenge to you, as I think you accurately described the sentiment that helped get Youngkin elected.

So parents were upset that they would have no role in their children's education so they elected the guy that is going to outright ban a topic from being taught?
Basically.
 
Why are you dragging democrats into this?
Can you clarify what you mean by this question? Doesn't make any sense without some clarification.
 
I'm trying to figure out where you are going with your point of connecting the voting preferences of the majority of Hispanic voters in Virginia to white supremacy.
I didn't. You made that connection. I was connecting Hispanic social preferences to their dislike of "Latinx". That's why I put it after that sentence.
 
Can you clarify what you mean by this question? Doesn't make any sense without some clarification.
Before 1930, the Democrats were the conservative party, with strong agrarian roots, while the Republicans were pro-business and relatively more liberal. All the Southern states were just as comparatively conservative as they are today, and deeply Democratic because that was the more conservative party. Over the next 40+ years, the Republicans stayed pro-business, but the Democrats moved from being agrarian to being more social-safety oriented. This was accompanied by a leftward move in their political positions.

Scat is using the right-wing pretense that the party of racists 100 years ago is still the party of racists today, despite 1) the obvious switching of the Southern states to the Republican party, and 2) the declarations of the racists themselves. It's an argument designed to help racists believe that they are not really racist.
 
Back
Top