any evidence of your own yet?
for the record, I have a reasoned and consistent opinion about how I see the developmental trajectories of both players. It's your inability to grasp even course-grained nuance that prevents you from understanding it.
We don't agree on what's evidence.
That's just wrong. But it's also not even the point of the thought experiment. If he got a minutes on a good team his plus minus would have been higher.
I'm not a wishy washy fence sitter like you.
apparently you don't even know what evidence is.
I'm gonna let you in on a secret: you're out on your own island. And nobody who's paying attention believes the stupid **** you say about me. AND, your personal attacks are looking especially pathetic in this context right now when I'm trying to give you a stage to make a reasoned argument. And you can't. Phew, it's looking bad for you brough
Really?
Tell me how his real plus minus is evidence he sucks. While simultaneously explaining how his teamates don't effect that.
I'm waiting. I've been waiting for you to explain that, but you keep dodging it. I'm giving the platform to do it.
Please do. Quit running from it.
Lol.
What have I said about you?
ThisI thought Hack would like it, it was rather pro-Lavine I thought.
Seriously, you're disappointing me... and I have no expectations of your intelligence. This thread is about Zach LaVine. It's your thread. Care to provide some evidence somewhere in here? Or are you determined to dodge? Cuz I'm getting bored.
what a troll.