What's new
By:

Banning reverse trolls

Sloanfeld

Sloanfeld

Banned
Can we ban reverse trolls? You know, the ones who act all superior to everyone and while they don't intend to stir up trouble they always have to remind us that they don't like a person and crap their threads/posts rather than ignoring them or disregarding their post altogether.
 
Sloanfeld said:
Can we ban reverse trolls? You know, the ones who act all superior to everyone and while they don't intend to stir up trouble they always have to remind us that they don't like a person and crap their threads/posts rather than ignoring them or disregarding their post altogether.
Click to expand...

I really do hate you.
 
Oh the irony of you making this post is so incredibly rich I can hardly stand it.
 
It's clear that you and JJ Rage don't even know what the hell I'm talking about. I'll give a semi-detailed example with fake usernames for you remedial buffoons:

Thread: dakotaJazz: NBA to lockout for TWO YEARS!!!!

Reply 1: luckyfortynine: Fail

Reply 2: PP Cage: I wish you would lock out for two years.

Reply 3: Numerisuck: this poster is currently on your ignore list


The three posters who replied in this example are the reverse trolls. They don't intend to start trouble, but they make unnecessary comments over and over when they are not warranted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UB
hey Sloanfelled, I gotta question for you - - in the great pot and kettle debate, who's the winner?
 
Sloanfeld said:
They don't intend to start trouble, but they make unnecessary comments over and over when they are not warranted.
Click to expand...

I think I understand. Comments like this:

Hagar >>>> Roth just like Boozer >>>>> Jefferson.
Click to expand...

The Bozzer comment is not meant to start trouble (debatable) but it is certainly not warranted in the context of the thread. Gotcha.
 
LogGrad98 said:
I think I understand. Comments like this:



The Bozzer comment is not meant to start trouble (debatable) but it is certainly not warranted in the context of the thread. Gotcha.
Click to expand...

A difference of opinion is totally separate from calling someone names or expressing dislike for somebody. Do you have a learning disability or something?
 
Sloanfeld said:
Reply 3: Numerisuck:


The three posters who replied in this example are the reverse trolls. They don't intend to start trouble, but they make unnecessary comments over and over when they are not warranted.
Click to expand...

Sloanfeld said:
A difference of opinion is totally separate from calling someone names or expressing dislike for somebody. Do you have a learning disability or something?
Click to expand...

OK so in bold you define it as an unwarranted comment used over and over. You refer to Boozer and how stupid everyone else is because they do not love Boozer over and over in every thread whether it is warranted or not.

So you got nailed on that one, so you changed the definition. Calling names or expressing dislike. So then you call Numberica "Numerisuck" and accuse me of having a learning disability. Pretty much encompasses your second definition.

No matter what definition you use, you are the best example of a reverse troll.

Care to change it again and go for a trifecta?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top