The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

[Harambe]

Yeah there's corruption on both parties. Hillary's team deleted emails and smashed phones. That is 100% fact. Now answer my question what crime did I say she was guilty of? Smashing phones and whitewashing emails. Which she did. No crime.

Cleared of mishandling classified information.

Suck it dude. You were wrong.

 

[One Brow]

What is Hillary guilty of? I really don't know. I've never said she's guilty of anything more than her employees smashing phones, and whitewashing hard drives which did happen. If I'm wrong by all means.

So, her aides are "guilty" of destroying Clinton's personal property, or Clinton is "guilty" of telling people to destroy her personal property? When did you become some Communist who thinks they can tell other people what to do with their property?

 

[One Brow]

Thank you. Goodnight m

I'm glad you agree Trump should be impeached for obstruction of justice. Good night.

 

[Deleted member 365]

I agree that it's insane how often you need to be corrected. Maybe don't be such an inaccurate poster and you wouldn't see that.

Like if you said there wasn't enough evidence found to convict Trump of collusion with Russia then I either wouldn't quote you or I would quote you and say I agree.
But you keep saying nothing happened from the Russia investigation. So I explain you are wrong.
Then you freak out and start playing the victim card.

It's insane

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

It’s why I have him on ignore. I’ve had more intellectually honest conversations with my garbage can than with @JazzyFresh. It’s the same damn schtick every single day with him:

1. He posts questions to instigate a bad faith argument.
2. He’s refuted.
3. He pretends to be ignorant and nonpartisan and asks for proof for questions that have been answered hundreds of times before. Often these answers are on the very thread page he’s writing on.
4. His ignorance is revealed by posters trying to educate him.
5. He gets all pissy and plays the victim card. He claims “he’s going to be the bigger person” and “steps away.”
6. He returns within 24 hours to repeat this whole process.

I don’t know why he does what he does. I’ve heard that trolls typically lack self-esteem and getting punked online gets them off? But I’m not a medical doctor so there’s no way for me to credibly speculate as to why he subjects us to his dog vomit every single day.

 

[Zombie]

 

[Deleted member 365]

Not to overshadow your bombshell, but this is concerning:

 

[Deleted member 365]

According to the article he’s:

The colonel, a Ukrainian-American immigrant who received a Purple Heart after being wounded in Iraq by a roadside bomb

So he sounds like the typical anti-American pro clinton deep stater.

“This would all undermine U.S. national security,” Colonel Vindman added, referring to Mr. Trump’s comments in the call.

Funny, not a single republican has brought this up. Probably because they know how damaging this is to our national security.

He will testify that he watched with alarm as “outside influencers” began pushing a “false narrative” about Ukraine that was counter to the consensus view of American national security officials, and harmful to United States interests. According to documents reviewed by The Times on the eve of his congressional testimony, Colonel Vindman was concerned as he discovered that Rudolph W. Giuliani, the president’s personal lawyer, was leading an effort to prod Kiev to investigate Mr. Biden’s son, and to discredit efforts to investigate Mr. Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, and his business dealings in Ukraine.

His account strongly suggests that he may have been among the aides the whistle-blower referred to in his complaint.

No one seems to refute the whistleblower’s complaint. It’s almost like it’s all true and very damning. Do republicans expect this to get better for them?

 

[Deleted member 365]

ummm

 

[Zombie]

ummm

Right on cue.

 

[Red]

Not sure if the Times article included NSC official Vindman's full opening statement. If not:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/28/politics/wh-ukraine-expert-opening-statement/index.html

 

[colton]

 

[Deleted member 365]

It’s interesting how Irma Grese on Fox News last night and now Fox News today (especially Fox n Friends) is spinning that because Vindman is Ukrainian (and Jewish) he cannot he trusted since he has divided loyalties. It’s almost like despite having served his country for his entire career and winning the Purple Heart, his loyalties are still “divided.”

Funny how this always seems to happen to critics of the president. Especially when they’re Jewish... why are right wingers always so angry at jews?