Most of your gripes, regardless of the particulars, could be scientists warning of global warming, could be “the Resistance”,
could be the CFR, could be George Soros, could be Obama, could be the British, whatever, fall into a simple equation:
1) Powerful people
2) Powerful people, acting covertly
3) Powerful people, acting covertly, with malevolent intent.
And that’s about it. That’s all you got.
Don't be an idiot.
People with power do stuff, mostly somewhat different from public knowledge, and in their own interest. Possibly in line with their beliefs of how the world should be. But that is fundamentally inconsistent with the idea of a government accountable to the public it serves.
In the early 1950s, a Senator McCarthy ran a committee to explore Russian influence in high levels of our government. Today the House under Pelosi has run an even more baseless campaign to claim Trump is influenced somehow by Russia.
When the old CCCP broke up, we got to see the files of the KGB. Most of what McCarthey saw in the darkened halls of Congress had some basis. The Trump investigation has lost its wheels. The facts are out now to show it was Americans, members of a liberal think tank with ties to Hillary Clinton who started it, and maintained it.
But the dems and the media just won't stop telling the lies. I don't think you will even read the story, or look for it.
I am going to start doing complaints about baseless analyses of what you or others imagine, and put into posts unrelated to discussion points, in the line of personal attacks.
I can't maintain I know much about politics out in these hills with the cows. But even when I am being rather baseless in comments echoing locals around me or radio talk show content, but it's not organized like a Revolutionary Cell, say of the Trotsky plan.
The reason Communism is inconsistent with American traditional principles most American still want to hold sway in their government, is just this. It is an ideology or cause that basically asserts that people need to be run like puppets to achieve change. There are not a lot of really top dog Communists. There might be millions of pup Communists with essentially no power, and no place to make a difference unless it's as foot soldiers obeying orders, but all dictatorships rely on some kind of inner circle of influencers, and Communism has not proven any different.
Game mocks me conjuring up a false narrative that a conspiracy needs to be a huge number of insiders. No conspiracy, no political movement can be like that. Too many cooks spoil the stew. Authoritarian systems have to be run top down ,and never are really any kind of "democracy".
The Communist Cell is a top down structure where one controller manages perhaps several cells, and that controller looks to a higher up who may have other cells working on the other side of contentious issue. It would be nothing for a coordinated political operation to have several controlled groups on various sides of an issue, or even of many issues, where no one on the lower levels really knows what the whole scheme is.
In addition to this, much reliance is made on "fellow travelers" or dupes. Let's just say this is likely the majority of people in the "cause". They are never told the scheme, they are just told the group is working for some purpose that can be understood in a very positive light. Remember, the method is practically all manipulation.
I don't know anything directly about most billionaires, but I see their philanthropic causes they put money out for, and publicize. I don't imagine that is all there is to it.
Many are involved in the US CFR national level. There are more than 10K members. I know some, am related to some. I subscribe to their newsletters and get publications and get the speech materials that they put out to the public. A cornerstone rule of the CFR is "non-attribution", meaning that members can't publish materials from the meetings. The organization itself does put some stuff out. They have some Communist members but most are just ordinary....but very successful.... professionals. They go to the meetings, eat the dinner, listen to speaker, and read some recommended books, and network for their business interests or other interests.
But the very consistent theme of the organization is global reorganization under various specific plans deemed beneficial.
If anyone publishes material that the public is not meant to know, they get banned. I believe the person who took the video of Biden talking about pressuring the Ukrainian government got ousted. Most of the Resistance in the Press and in the Washington Power Elite are members of the CFR. The CFR publishes a member list for Gawd's sake, but it is not a complete list. A member gets to elect whether to be shown on the list.
This is a very powerful set of influencers. We rarely get a President who is not given support from this group. Trump went to the Pres of the CFR and asked for support. But he told his ideas about making America Great Again, and that is practically the opposite of the global reorganization.
Our CFR mirrors outfits in Britain, Canada, Australia......even Russia and China have comparable organizations.
If you don't know that some of the bigger players on our globe have plans for us they just won't really admit outright, you are just ignorant of the truth.
What the American conservative movement has been trying to do is fundamentally inconsistent with global governance.
I believe in Federal systems of governance where the most power is so far as possible left in the hands of the local government units most answerable to their local voters.