There have been corrections to inaccurate stories. It is standard practice. I would be happy to hunt a few down for you.Well, no GF. I was wrong. I did say it that way, and that isn't particularly helpful. Even in disagreement, knowledge of different povs is beneficial, sometimes even necessary. In the case of Trump, and I get why some find him hard to like, they (media, democrats, FBI, CIA, later the FDA, WHO, etc) did intentionally lie to the public/their audience...for years. It wasn't about a point of view, it was malicious with intent to turn people against him and his family, because he was in the way just like he said. As the Truth comes out, their ratings continue to nosedive and (predictably) there hasn't been one apology nor admission of accountability/responsibility.
What was he in the way of?
Is there a direct correlation to the truth coming out and a decline in ratings? I haven't watched the news in more than 10 years. I imagine the largest audience of people who watch the news are people from the baby boom generation. They also, despite having been the hippies and love children when they were in their late teens or early to mid twenties, are the strongest supporters of Trump by a very large margin.
I want to ask again, why did the military seek out Trump specifically? To me he seems like a very very odd choice. Trump is popular within the ranks but not as much amongst the generals. Do you think there was some movement from within the enlisted ranks to recruit Donald Trump that went under the radar of the high level Officers?
I think sometimes the media feel an obligation to warn people of danger. I think that was the motivation behind their biased view of Trump, that he was a real and present danger to the United States.