And he can’t shoot.Essengue is a high level defensive wing with play finishing as an 18 y.o. If you're going to give Fears the benefit of doubts, you kind of have to do the same with Noa.
And he can’t shoot.Essengue is a high level defensive wing with play finishing as an 18 y.o. If you're going to give Fears the benefit of doubts, you kind of have to do the same with Noa.
when you're 6'11" and just turned 18, is 30% from three against better competition than any college player really that bad? saying he "can't shoot" (in general and if it fits, i otherwise have no problem with that phrase) doesn't seem quite fair.And he can’t shoot.
If you have watched him shoot.......he can shoot. His form isnt bad at all. Hes a giraffe growing into an elite NBA body.And he can’t shoot.
what's crazy about Essengue too, is for a guy with monster potential, i actually think his floor is pretty high as well. iow, he might be one of the lowest risk guys in the draft just based on his production at such a young age at a high level in europe.If you have watched him shoot.......he can shoot. His form isnt bad at all. Hes a giraffe growing into an elite NBA body.
He's my huge upside bet in this draft.
I think it's a concern. There are plenty of really good players who aren't the most athletic, but I'm not sure if Kon is quite a crafty as them.Kon’s measurements scare the crap out of me. 6’5, + 1 wingspan, and plays with “meh” athleticism.
He’s got great strength, balance, and body control but I worry he just gets gobbled up by long athletic wings.
Zero interest in Kon at #5.
100% agree. Look at his passing as an example of his BBIQ and feel.what's crazy about Essengue too, it's for a guy with monster potential, i actually think his floor is pretty high as well. iow, he might be one of the lowest risk guys in the draft just based on his production at such a young age at a high level in europe.
It feels like there have been a ton of similar prospects to him that have busted. I could be wrong as I haven't followed the draft that closely for that many years.what's crazy about Essengue too, it's for a guy with monster potential, i actually think his floor is pretty high as well. iow, he might be one of the lowest risk guys in the draft just based on his production at such a young age at a high level in europe.
He's averaging 1.1ast and 1.0 turnovers.100% agree. Look at his passing as an example of his BBIQ and feel.
He's not a dummy with insane length and athleticism. I will get roasted for this but he gives me early Giannis vibes.
Kas isn't unathletic for the NCAA, but he'll be an average athlete in the NBA, so maybe what he did in college won't translate as well? Or maybe that will be offset by the NBA being even more rewarding to foul baiters like Kas.
Yes you will; Giannis was playing point guard.100% agree. Look at his passing as an example of his BBIQ and feel.
He's not a dummy with insane length and athleticism. I will get roasted for this but he gives me early Giannis vibes.
My comment had nothing to do with his number of assists. It was in reference to some high level reads and the ability to identify an advantage.He's averaging 1.1ast and 1.0 turnovers.
FWIW, I think I see the upside, I just don't think he's a safe pick at all, especially not at 5.
there really haven't. guys who produce at europe's highest levels in their teens rarely bust. it's not unheard of, of course, but it's rare. and it makes sense. they are playing against grown men who have played in the league, were stars in college, etc - but it's not fake basketball like the g league - it's legit hard to put up big numbers. if you can do that at 18/19, it's rare you won't become a useful player in the NBA.It feels like there have been a ton of similar prospects to him that have busted. I could be wrong as I haven't followed the draft that closely for that many years.
Bookmark it and holler at me in 6 years then.Yes you will; Giannis was playing point guard.
There are about 100 more examples of Coulibalys than Giannises.
Essengue is a fine prospect. Using the 5th pick on him is ****ing madness. Truly.Bookmark it and holler at me in 6 years then.
That's fine, but we are talking about his floor here. At least by my definition a floor involves things that a prospect has demonstrated with enough frequency that it feels repeatable.My comment had nothing to do with his number of assists. It was in reference to some high level reads and the ability to identify an advantage.
I think we get caught on this board a lot with "here are his stats now at 18, so thats all he will be at 24 with NBA development".
And yet most GM's **** up the draft as an annual tradition. There is no science my brother.That's fine, but we are talking about his floor here. At least by my definition a floor involves things that a prospect has demonstrated with enough frequency that it feels repeatable.
It doesn't feel like 12pts/5reb/1ast in one of the less good European leagues is great production, but I don't have a super great feel for this.there really haven't. guys who produce at europe's highest levels in their teens rarely bust. it's not unheard of, of course, but it's rare. and it makes sense. they are playing against grown men who have played in the league, were stars in college, etc - but it's not fake basketball like the g league - it's legit hard to put up big numbers. if you can do that at 18/19, it's rare you won't become a useful player in the NBA.
most of the euro busts over the years are guys who rarely played and/or didn't produce much in the top levels or who put up numbers at the junior levels.
Three things:Literally LOL'n.........where in this board have I ever said we should take him at 5?
View attachment 18730
^Thats the name of the thread^. So, like, we talk about potential 2025 draftees. All of em.