The refs took away a bucket from Brice. Not sure why. Brice is still 1-7.
We're playing the Lakers.The refs took away a bucket from Brice. Not sure why. Brice is still 1-7.
????
Cody didn't tank the offense because it wasn't tanked with him on the court.
Calling it a small sample size is using it to predict whether the Jazz will continue to have an ok offense with him on the court. That's my opinion, but I could be wrong.
Let's wait til Ace successfully scores off a dribble drive or draws a shooting foul ok a drive before saying thatI think eventually Ace is going to be better than Lauri. He might not be the same pure volume scorer that Lauri is, but he's got more handle and shift off the dribble. He'll be able to create for himself.
was excellent in the first half in the halfcourt.Collier has been horribble in the halfcourt
That's not my point though. I'm not saying Cody is a good offensive player or that he makes our offense better. I'm not saying the offense couldn't be better with someone else taking his minutes. My point has been that he's not a tank commander, in the sense that he singlehandedly loses us games, which is the reason some posters think he should continue to play.But you don't know what the alternative would be if he wasn't on the court. If Cody was not playing the offensive rating could have been even higher. If you cause performance to go from good to average, that's still tanking the offense. It works in the opposite way as well. For example, if you think Cody is helping the defense, the defensive rating can still be worse when he's on the court. If you have the capacity to understand how Cody can be a defensive positive despite a bad defensive rating,
Calling it a SSS is not only to predict what will happen in the future, but also calls into speculation how much you can attribute +/- to a specific player.