Following potential 2014 draftees
- Thread starter Dr. Jones
- Start date
spycam1
Well-Known Member
I'd keep Trey over Burks, if I had to make the choice right now. But we'll see what they do this season.
Even if Burke was decent this season, if we had to pick BPA and he happened to be Andrew, I still think Burke would need to go (or accept a back up role, which he won't).
![[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]](/data/avatars/m/2/2497.jpg?1511131091){kind=avatar}
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]
Well-Known Member
@PKM
I'm sure you've already said this one hundred times, but I wasn't around to hear it.
What do you make of Andrew Harrison's ability to play SG? He has the size, right?
If he's BPA, then would you look to trade Burke (let's just say that he has a solid rookie year), or do you get excited about the depth and potential matchups that comes with having both players?
Thanks. Rep coming.
I'm sure you've already said this one hundred times, but I wasn't around to hear it.
What do you make of Andrew Harrison's ability to play SG? He has the size, right?
If he's BPA, then would you look to trade Burke (let's just say that he has a solid rookie year), or do you get excited about the depth and potential matchups that comes with having both players?
Thanks. Rep coming.
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];686136 said:
I don't know.. but Andrew is way too good to be moved to SG. He is a very strong, good shooting, leader that understands the game very well and plays with unbelievable maturity and poise.
If he was bpa I'd take him and gauge whether he and Burke can both be kept or if one needed to be traded... but I wouldn't move either out of the PG role.
♪alt13
Well-Known Member
yep. I always wondered why LA put up with magic for so long. The guy was obviously a shooting guard.
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]
Well-Known Member
Kool.
I mean, if Burke pans out, and if Andrew Harrison is drafted, then I would agree that these two players should play 100% of the PG minutes. I think the more interesting questions are about whether they could share the floor and how. Having Burke, Andrew, and Hayward on the floor at the same time could produce some beautiful passing. Maybe we could finally fully tap Derrick and Enes' potentials.
I mean, if Burke pans out, and if Andrew Harrison is drafted, then I would agree that these two players should play 100% of the PG minutes. I think the more interesting questions are about whether they could share the floor and how. Having Burke, Andrew, and Hayward on the floor at the same time could produce some beautiful passing. Maybe we could finally fully tap Derrick and Enes' potentials.
b_line
Well-Known Member
lol, one transcendent player in the last 50 years and all of a sudden the point guard position is redefined?
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]
Well-Known Member
who defined the position in the first place? Where was it listed how tall the player should be?
thanks for the links.
thanks for the links.
♪alt13
Well-Known Member
or we start with magic turn that into orlando magic and arive at penny hardaway. A players position is not necessarily decided by their heigth ultimately it only matters that they play where they are most effective for their team.
b_line
Well-Known Member
totally agree, I did not mean my statement of height to be that.
Hantlers
Well-Known Member
What is there to talk about?
I'm not going to report on practice reports, or scrimmages. Screw that noise, that tells me nothing. After roughly 10 games have gone by, that's when you can expect to see me talk about prospects. I'd like to actually watch them before I speculate on how good they'll be, what kind of role they could play for us, and where they'll be drafted.
If I was to comment on them now, it would be a worthless opinion, and I don't like to give those out. So until then, I'm going to say stupid things, which are still eons brighter than anything Nickkkkk has to say.
Hmm.. hard to argue that last point.
WTF ??? Leave me out of this please.