What's new

Where is that pit bull thread when I need it?

Perhaps only a black market would appear for these animals, or dogs in general, if specific people were banned from owning animals. Such as felons and firearms.

As for your scenario I think it would certainly lessen the demand for .45 ammo but I think the deamnd would still exist.

Agreed.
 
I thought I made my point very well. They are dangerous. But so are dozens of other breeds. The most dangerous thing is a negative development, which falls upon the owner. Ban the owner, not the dog.

And I really hate to agree with dutchjazzer on anything, but I've got several friends that own pitbulls. The more "socially and economically mature" owners have had 0 problems. Those that are "socially and economically immature" is another story.


even a broken clock is right twice a day :p.

but seirously dont hate the person. you can still hate me while agreeing with me on this subject
 
istil can be rpoven that bron jumps higher than stocj

Not really.
Maybe stockton was holding back all that time and not jumping as high as he could ;-)
 
As an insurance guy I can tell you that that **** would never fly. There is not enough actuarial data available to even guess what rates would be like, not to mention the cost of actually underwriting something like that. There is already pet insurance as well as liability insurance; some of which covers dog bites, but to just insure a dog against the possibility of it attacking and/or killing someone or something? Never happen.
 
As an insurance guy I can tell you that that **** would never fly. There is not enough actuarial data available to even guess what rates would be like, not to mention the cost of actually underwriting something like that. There is already pet insurance as well as liability insurance; some of which covers dog bites, but to just insure a dog against the possibility of it attacking and/or killing someone or something? Never happen.

Never is a long time. You can insure most anything in today's age so I don't see it as too much of a stretch.
 
Never is a long time. You can insure most anything in today's age so I don't see it as too much of a stretch.

You can insure anything, that is true, but that's the equivalent of telling your son (or in your case, Mr. Lonelyinmomsbasement, your right hand) that they can be WHATEVER they want to be when they grow up. Sure, it can happen, but it won't. No insurance company is going to put money on the line to insure something that has little-to-no empirical or actuarial data; as long as they want to be profitable, that is. There is a reason that no company out there is doing it.
 
As an insurance guy I can tell you that that **** would never fly. There is not enough actuarial data available to even guess what rates would be like, not to mention the cost of actually underwriting something like that. There is already pet insurance as well as liability insurance; some of which covers dog bites, but to just insure a dog against the possibility of it attacking and/or killing someone or something? Never happen.

Thank you for your input.

If there's not enough evidence to appropriately judge what rates would be like, how is there enough evidence to damn the breed as a whole?
 
So it comes down to either you are for our against pit bulls. No one had convinced anyone of anything no opinions have changed. This is a completely pointless thread.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 
So it comes down to either you are for our against pit bulls. No one had convinced anyone of anything no opinions have changed. This is a completely pointless thread.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk


well it wont change anyhing. just go out and hagng out with pitbulls and their owners.
depending on your samplesize.
you might hate em or like em.

if you see a pattern in the owners. you might see that the owners are to blame. not the pitbulls
 
well it wont change anyhing. just go out and hagng out with pitbulls and their owners.
depending on your samplesize.
you might hate em or like em.

if you see a pattern in the owners. you might see that the owners are to blame. not the pitbulls

Didn't say I was for or against them. All I'm saying is that the people in this thread already have their minds made up. Read two hundred and sixty posts didn't see anyone change positions on their stance. And I think animals are like people some are just jerks doesn't matter breed or species.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 
Didn't say I was for or against them. All I'm saying is that the people in this thread already have their minds made up. Read two hundred and sixty posts didn't see anyone change positions on their stance. And I think animals are like people some are just jerks doesn't matter breed or species.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

it wont change people mind.
we all draw from experience.

experience > words
 
I think everyone should own American war dog like your Michael Victor. This is land of the war lover so why ban dog who make war in neighborhood? American is for Wild West so why make civil laws?
 
After watching, DIE ANTWOORD - PITBULL TERRIER music video, I think pitbulls need to be banned immediately. If you don't know what I'm talking about, youtube it. I'd post the video but it swears. ****ing terrifying.
 
After watching, DIE ANTWOORD - PITBULL TERRIER music video, I think pitbulls need to be banned immediately. If you don't know what I'm talking about, youtube it. I'd post the video but it swears. ****ing terrifying.

i can do some terrifying **** with a pen, a pair of scissors, cigarettes, a pair pliers and a bathtub.
so we then must conclude to: BAN BATHTUBS and pens
 
After watching, DIE ANTWOORD - PITBULL TERRIER music video, I think pitbulls need to be banned immediately. If you don't know what I'm talking about, youtube it. I'd post the video but it swears. ****ing terrifying.

Also watch some adult homosexual films.
it will terrify you.


BAN FILMS!
 
Top