It would be nice if you could provide some links. It is sad that people who have made a life-changing decision could be so close-minded against some women who just want equalism.
Science vs. Creationism
- Thread starter dodo
- Start date
It would be nice if you could provide some links. It is sad that people who have made a life-changing decision could be so close-minded against some women who just want equalism.
Half the bloggers at freethoughtblogs.com talk about it. Shakesville, skepchic, etc.
Thanks. Will check them out. I should read more blogs.
carolinajazz
Well-Known Member
....ok, your the genius! So what happened to the Aborigines, the Native Americans, and the Japanese? I guess they all "evolved" separately on or in there native lands? From Biblical chronology the flood occurred in 2370*B.C.E
Noah and his family entered the ark in the 600th year of Noah’s life, the 2nd month (October-November), the 17th day. (Ge 7:11) One year later (a year consisting of 360 days) was the 17th day, 2nd month, 601st year. Ten days after that would be the 27th day of the 2nd month, when they came out; a total of 370 days, or parts of 371 separate days, spent in the ark. (Ge 8:13,*14) In the log that Noah kept, it appears he used months of 30 days each, 12 of them equaling 360 days. In this way he avoided all the complicated fractions involved had he used strictly lunar months consisting of slightly more than 29 1⁄2 days. That such calculations were used in the account is evident from the fact that a five-month period consisted of 150 days.—Ge 7:11,*24; 8:3,*4.
With the Deluge great changes came, for example, the life span of humans dropped very rapidly. Some have suggested that prior to the Flood the waters above the expanse shielded out some of the harmful radiation and that, with the waters gone, cosmic radiation genetically harmful to man increased. However, the Bible is silent on the matter. Incidentally, any change in radiation would have altered the rate of formation of radioactive carbon-14 to such an extent as to invalidate all radiocarbon dates prior to the Flood.
MVP
Well-Known Member
Can you please stop quoting that mythology book - it has no relationship to the answer I am asking.
So you guess all these nations evolved into what they were before the flood and what they are now from Noah's family and spread all over the world from Middle East in just a few years? We do have undeniable evidence of people activity in all continents way before " supposed" flood and after... how did that happen? Did your creator just "magically recreated and teleported" thousands of people all over the world? And changed their racial features, languages and general advancement levels at the same time?
Do you understand that you trying to sell magic fairies, trolls and unicorns here?
To be sure, there are a lot of issues with new Feminists as well as New Athiests. I have no issues with feminists.
More Watchtower material. You don't think it's a big deal that you continue quoting sources without giving a citation?
https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1200001150?q=earth+day&p=par
ctrl+f the quoted statement.
What the difference between the "new Feminists" and other feminists, or the New Atheists and other atheists?
carolinajazz
Well-Known Member
“I'm for truth, no matter who tells it." ...isn't that on the bottom of everyone of your posts? So what's the big deal? If I quote, copy and paste and otherwise use material to point out the "truth" then be happy you had the chance to read and absorb it!
Proper attribution is a mark of honest debate.
Absolutely. That CJ can't see that is incredibly telling about his character.
BENTLEY
Well-Known Member
John Angus Campbell on Philip Johnson, author of Darwin on Trial:
From an interview with him on the rhetoric of Darwin.
https://www.understandingorigins.org/the_rhetoric_of_darwin.html
From an interview with him on the rhetoric of Darwin.
https://www.understandingorigins.org/the_rhetoric_of_darwin.html
Johnson spoke at lenght in his book, and produced horrible arguments with no appreciable truth. It's very easy, almost ridiculously so, to rebut his arguments. It's much more likely that Campbell witness people correcting Johnson on lies right from the start.