What's new
By:

Chess Match Thread

babe said:
1. e4 d6
2. d4 e6
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Nf3 Nc6
5. Be2 h6
6. a3 a6
7. h3 Be7
8. 0-0 0-0
9. Bf4 b5
10. Qd2 Nh7
11. d5 e5
12. dxc6 exf4
13. Qxf4 Bf6
14. Qe3 Be6
15. Rad1 Bxc3
16. Qxc3 , Qe7

for some reason my board pic is mixed up, switching the file designations and rank to based on black lower left corner being a1. I mean to move my queen diagonal left and forward to the corner square. . . . from my black perspective. . . . my Qe7 defined by the designations in your previous post.

Click to expand...

For some reason it messes up the coordinates when you use the "flip the board" option along with the click-able url. I couldn't figured it out yet. As a solution, I keep a pgn rotation of our game in a notepad file and copy-paste it to the "game replayer" tool on that website each time I make a move and then I click the "Copy this position to the Diagram Generator" link, so when I flip the board for the black viewpoint it doesn't become wrong in this way. If you'd like to do the same way, I can post our PGN rotation in my posts every time like I'm gonna do in this post.



1. e4 d6
2. d4 e6
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Nf3 Nc6
5. Be2 h6
6. a3 a6
7. h3 Be7
8. 0-0 0-0
9. Bf4 b5
10. Qd2 Nh7
11. d5 e5
12. dxc6 exf4
13. Qxf4 Bf6
14. Qe3 Be6
15. Rad1 Bxc3
16. Qxc3 Qe7
17. e5


The PGN notation, it's essentially the same with the notation we use but the spaces and small mistakes in ours make it unacceptable by the site so I correct it and keep it in a notepad file.
1.e4 d6 2.d4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nf3 Nc6 5.Be2 h6 6.a3 a6 7.h3 Be7 8.O-O O-O 9.Bf4 b5 10.Qd2 Nh7 11.d5 e5 12.dxc6 exf4 13.Qxf4 Bf6 14.Qe3 Be6 15.Rad1 Bxc3 16.Qxc3 Qe7 17.e5 *
Click to expand...
 
babe said:
This is my first time ever hearing of him. . . . . way outta the league with you folks I guess. . . .

look at those rankings in the 2700 range, one in the 2800. And that's as good as it gets. . . .
Click to expand...

Siro said:
Hard to believe Carlsen is 23 years old. It feels like yesterday when I first heard of him, and he was just a little kid.
Click to expand...
Yeah, time flies indeed. I was newly learning chess when Carlsen became famous. Kasparov along with Fischer were my idols, so obviously, I couldn't believe the first time I heard that a 13 year old kid managed to get a draw against Kasparov. In fact I rejected to believe it until I saw the game on a science magazine. And much later, I watched the videos about it. It's almost like a movie scene and Kasparov's face is definitely worth to see when he accepted that he couldn't beat the kid. Actually it was him that could barely get the draw from the game.

No doubt that Carlsen will be one of the bests ever if he can keep staying at the top for a decent period of time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjEmquJhSas
 
Jonah vs. One Brow




1. e4 e6
2. d4 d5
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Bg5 Be7
5. e5 Nd7
6. Bxe7 Qxe7
7. Qd2 c5
8. Nb5 Nc6
9. Nd6+ Kd8
10. dc Nd7


Don't worry about generating the diagrams too much. It's pretty easy for us.
 


1. Nf3 e6
2. g3 Nc6
3. Bg2 Be7
4. d4 f5
5. b3 Nf6
6. Bb2 0-0
7. c4 b6
8. d5 exd5
9. cxd5 Nb4
10. a3 Na6
11. Nd4 Bb7
12. Nxf5 Nc5
13. 0-0 d6
14. b4 Bc1
15. Nd4 Nb2
16. Nc3 Qe8
17. Nc3-b5 Bd1
18. Rc1 Rf7
19. Rc2 a6
20. Nc3 Bd7
21. Re1 Rc8
22. e4 c5
23. dxc6 e.p.
 


1. d4 Nf6
2. f4 g6
3. Nf3 Bg7
4. e3 d6
5. Bd3
 
Enes CanTear You Apart said:
Yeah, time flies indeed. I was newly learning chess when Carlsen became famous. Kasparov along with Fischer were my idols, so obviously, I couldn't believe the first time I heard that a 13 year old kid managed to get a draw against Kasparov. In fact I rejected to believe it until I saw the game on a science magazine. And much later, I watched the videos about it. It's almost like a movie scene and Kasparov's face is definitely worth to see when he accepted that he couldn't beat the kid. Actually it was him that could barely get the draw from the game.

No doubt that Carlsen will be one of the bests ever if he can keep staying at the top for a decent period of time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjEmquJhSas
Click to expand...


Awesome video, thanks for posting.

But this kind of thing makes me think of Bobby Fischer. If he hadn't been mentally unstable imagine where he could have gone in chess. He just saw the game in ways no one really has before or since. I am in no way knocking Carlsen or Kasparov (I love to watch both of them play), but Fischer's games were masterfully chaotic in ways that other players just could not comprehend. Then again, if he hadn't been mentally unstable then maybe he wouldn't have had the ability he did. He was such an enigma.

I think Carlsen will eventually prove to be one of, if not the absolute best player to ever play the game.
 
LogGrad98 vs. One Brow



1. Nf3 e6
2. g3 Nc6
3. Bg2 Be7
4. d4 f5
5. b3 Nf6
6. Bb2 0-0
7. c4 b6
8. d5 exd5
9. cxd5 Nb4
10. a3 Na6
11. Nd4 Bb7
12. Nxf5 Nc5
13. 0-0 d6
14. b4 Bc1
15. Nd4 Nb2
16. Nc3 Qe8
17. Nc3-b5 Bd1
18. Rc1 Rf7
19. Rc2 a6
20. Nc3 Bd7
21. Re1 Rc8
22. e4 c5
23. dxc6 e.p. Bxc6
 


1. Nf3 e6
2. g3 Nc6
3. Bg2 Be7
4. d4 f5
5. b3 Nf6
6. Bb2 0-0
7. c4 b6
8. d5 exd5
9. cxd5 Nb4
10. a3 Na6
11. Nd4 Bb7
12. Nxf5 Nc5
13. 0-0 d6
14. b4 Bc1
15. Nd4 Nb2
16. Nc3 Qe8
17. Nc3-b5 Bd1
18. Rc1 Rf7
19. Rc2 a6
20. Nc3 Bd7
21. Re1 Rc8
22. e4 c5
23. dxc6 e.p. Bxc6
24. Nxc6
 
Jonah vs. One Brow




1. e4 e6
2. d4 d5
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Bg5 Be7
5. e5 Nd7
6. Bxe7 Qxe7
7. Qd2 c5
8. Nb5 Nc6
9. Nd6+ Kd8
10. dc Nd7
11. Qa5+


Don't worry about generating the diagrams too much. It's pretty easy for us.
Click to expand...
Thanks, it's appreciated. I'll still try to do diagrams in the evenings.
 
LG98 vs. Jonah



1. d4 Nf6
2. f4 g6
3. Nf3 Bg7
4. e3 d6
5. Bd3 0-0

Note: Log, in this diagram there should be a pawn at d6. I'll try to do diagrams in the evenings.
 
LogGrad98 said:


1. Nf3 e6
2. g3 Nc6
3. Bg2 Be7
4. d4 f5
5. b3 Nf6
6. Bb2 0-0
7. c4 b6
8. d5 exd5
9. cxd5 Nb4
10. a3 Na6
11. Nd4 Bb7
12. Nxf5 Nc5
13. 0-0 d6
14. b4 Bc1
15. Nd4 Nb2
16. Nc3 Qe8
17. Nc3-b5 Bd1
18. Rc1 Rf7
19. Rc2 a6
20. Nc3 Bd7
21. Re1 Rc8
22. e4 c5
23. dxc6 e.p. Bxc6
24. Nxc6
Click to expand...

Resigns.

I completely miscalculated that last sequence.
 
Jonah vs. One Brow



1. e4 e6
2. d4 d5
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Bg5 Be7
5. e5 Nd7
6. Bxe7 Qxe7
7. Qd2 c5
8. Nb5 Nc6
9. Nd6+ Kd8
10. dc Nd7
11. Qa5+ b6
 
LogGrad98 said:
Awesome video, thanks for posting.

But this kind of thing makes me think of Bobby Fischer. If he hadn't been mentally unstable imagine where he could have gone in chess. He just saw the game in ways no one really has before or since. I am in no way knocking Carlsen or Kasparov (I love to watch both of them play), but Fischer's games were masterfully chaotic in ways that other players just could not comprehend. Then again, if he hadn't been mentally unstable then maybe he wouldn't have had the ability he did. He was such an enigma.

I think Carlsen will eventually prove to be one of, if not the absolute best player to ever play the game.
Click to expand...
Totally agreed, Fischer's play was absolutely the strongest of his era and the time before him. He totally dominated mighty Russians who always had the strongest chess tradition and he's done that without even having enough competition in his homeland. And after him, only a few of chess players came close to his level of play, such as Kasparov and very few others. In fact to many people, only Kasparov would be on the truly same level with Fischer and that is with the fact that Kasparov had a huge advantage over Fischer regarding the chess literature they had in their hands and could study.

There are also some late era studies, even though they are not perfectly reliable, that suggest that Fischer had the best scores among all the best chess players including Kasparov on computer analyses of their games that evaluate their moves and their statistics such as how many times they could find and played the best or strongest moves etc. That results make you wonder if he had in fact at least a semi-autistic condition or something similar that caused his brain to be able to see the game like no one could.

But at the end, it's indeed a dilemma, whether he was such an unmatched chess genius because of his unstable mind or he couldn't become what he could become because of his unstable mind.
 
I love Jonah's game, and I think he's a very interesting player. Also, I think I'm better than OB, and I can't wait to try and prove that next time we play. :p

Finally, there have been 19th century correspondence matches that took less time than Enes v. Babe's match.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ema
Jonah said:
LG98 vs. Jonah



1. d4 Nf6
2. f4 g6
3. Nf3 Bg7
4. e3 d6
5. Bd3 0-0
6. 0-0

Note: Log, in this diagram there should be a pawn at d6. I'll try to do diagrams in the evenings.
Click to expand...

Sorry I fixed it. Moves and diagrams in the quote above.
 
Enes CanTear You Apart said:
Totally agreed, Fischer's play was absolutely the strongest of his era and the time before him. He totally dominated mighty Russians who always had the strongest chess tradition and he's done that without even having enough competition in his homeland. And after him, only a few of chess players came close to his level of play, such as Kasparov and very few others. In fact to many people, only Kasparov would be on the truly same level with Fischer and that is with the fact that Kasparov had a huge advantage over Fischer regarding the chess literature they had in their hands and could study.

There are also some late era studies, even though they are not perfectly reliable, that suggest that Fischer had the best scores among all the best chess players including Kasparov on computer analyses of their games that evaluate their moves and their statistics such as how many times they could find and played the best or strongest moves etc. That results make you wonder if he had in fact at least a semi-autistic condition or something similar that caused his brain to be able to see the game like no one could.

But at the end, it's indeed a dilemma, whether he was such an unmatched chess genius because of his unstable mind or he couldn't become what he could become because of his unstable mind.
Click to expand...

Exactly. These are the same as the discussions about who is the GOAT in the basketball world. In chess we have an advantage in that we can analyze with computers, but invariably there is always some different variable that mixes up the order depending on how you program the analysis or what algorithms you use. But invariably you get some mix of Fischer, Kasparov, Karpov, Capablanca, Botvinnik, Alekhine, Lasker, and a few others, and then Carlsen gets thrown in the mix as well. It is an argument that will likely never be settled. For me the top 3 of all time, in order, are Fischer, Kasparov and Capablanca. Top 5 would include Carlsen and Karpov. Of course, as always, imho.

Here is the wiki page with a lot of these comparisons:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_top_chess_players_throughout_history
 
  • Like
Reactions: ema
One Brow said:
Resigns.

I completely miscalculated that last sequence.
Click to expand...

Good game nonetheless. I wondered when you made that pawn move if you just had a lapse in concentration or didn't think about the en passant move.
 
Jonah vs. One Brow

1jwemvz7y1mz.png


1. e4 e6
2. d4 d5
3. Nc3 Nf6
4. Bg5 Be7
5. e5 Nd7
6. Bxe7 Qxe7
7. Qd2 c5
8. Nb5 Nc6
9. Nd6+ Kd8
10. dc Nd7
11. Qa5+ b6
12. cb
 
LogGrad98 said:
Exactly. These are the same as the discussions about who is the GOAT in the basketball world. In chess we have an advantage in that we can analyze with computers, but invariably there is always some different variable that mixes up the order depending on how you program the analysis or what algorithms you use. But invariably you get some mix of Fischer, Kasparov, Karpov, Capablanca, Botvinnik, Alekhine, Lasker, and a few others, and then Carlsen gets thrown in the mix as well. It is an argument that will likely never be settled. For me the top 3 of all time, in order, are Fischer, Kasparov and Capablanca. Top 5 would include Carlsen and Karpov. Of course, as always, imho.

Here is the wiki page with a lot of these comparisons:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_top_chess_players_throughout_history
Click to expand...
That wiki page is great, thanks a lot. And it shows a lot of different opinions and approaches with all having some valid points. It is really hard to decide and it is very subjective.

Mine top 5 maybe would be,

Kasparov (overall)
Fischer (strongest ever, could be best if...)
Capablanca
Karpov
Anand

Looks like it's almost the same with your list.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top