Gay marriage has been legal across the country for 47 years?
In 47 years, no clergy person and no church has ever been force to perform an interracial marriage. It will be no different for gay marriage.
Gay marriage has been legal across the country for 47 years?
In 47 years, no clergy person and no church has ever been force to perform an interracial marriage. It will be no different for gay marriage.
In 47 years, no clergy person and no church has ever been force to perform an interracial marriage. It will be no different for gay marriage.
That idea makes me sick personally.
If you are a business open to the public, you better serve the public. Otherwise, don't open your business to the public.
Say there is a small town in the middle of nowhere that has a whopping one grocery store ( Burlington Colorado comes to mind). Let's also say the nearest grocery store after that one is 30 miles away. If the owner of that store hates gays and refuses to serve maybe the 1 or 2 gay guys in town, does that mean they now have to move our drive 30 miles for groceries? I doubt public pressure is going to shut the place down, and there probably isn't a good financial incentive to open another store.
So again, when you open a business to the public, serve the public.
So, let me get this straight. We shouldn't try to provide equal protection under the law to all, because some people might take it too far?
Ok, so let's force them gay people back into the closets where they belong, and once again deny them their equal protection under the law and full slate of civil rights, because some people might overreact. Yep, makes perfect sense to me.
IF and WHEN this becomes a real problem, and not just some isolated anecdotes, then we can deal with it as a serious problem. Discrimination against gays, however, much of it imposed by religious folk, has been a systematic and pervasive problem for millennia.
Fundamental Christianity will survive this just fine and will move on to find new 'out groups' to oppress.
By the way, I would stand with you to defend to the rights of religions and religious folks to practice their religion (provided it does not cross over into abuse, law breaking, etc.).
I agree governments suck balls.You have far more blind faith in our government than I do.
You have far more blind faith in our government than I do.
how come a bakery is forced to make wedding cakes with 2 dudes on top.
while a pornography studio is not?
is wedding cake a right pornography not?
I don't qualify 47 years of empirical evidence as "blind faith" for some reason.
Empirical evidence of one particular situation. For any other situation it would still be an assumption. Not all Germans grow up to be Nazis, and after more than 47 years Russia is no longer communist.
Godwined that sucker! Woot!
I got a question about this business and sexual discrimination.
a pornography studio is a business right.
but what if he only makes straight porn.
what if all pornographers decide to make only straight porn
would government force them to make gay porn?
so what gives?
how come a bakery is forced to make wedding cakes with 2 dudes on top.
while a pornography studio is not?
is wedding cake a right pornography not?
I agree governments suck balls.
not the cool kinda sucking.
the bad kinda sucking
People are allowed by law to marry members of their own gender.
Yes, we are aware of your fears, which are completely unfounded and untrue.
I'm quite sure that a bakery is not legally required to use any particular accessories or decorations. If a bakery only offers man-woman cake toppers they wouldn't be breaking the law. It would only be against the law to refuse to provide their existing services to someone based on that persons inclusion in a protected class.
Similarly, if there was a gay oriented cake shop and they refused to service "breeders" they would be breaking the same anti-discrimination law. As sexual orientation is a protected class.
IANAL, but these are my understandings:
If a pornography studio offered to film any couple off the street, they would be required to film gay couples.
If a bakery only sold wedding cakes off the shelf, as opposed to making them to order, they could stock their shelves as they pleased.
so if you go on a site not gonna name it here where the have clips for sale
these custom clips from certain porn stars(don't know if there is one with men).
yet they don't have gay (or in case of queer porn stars straight clips made to order) i could sue them?
since these are not off the shelf clips, but cusotm made.
BRB gonna sew some of em NOW!
so if you go on a site not gonna name it here where the have clips for sale
these custom clips from certain porn stars(don't know if there is one with men).
yet they don't have gay (or in case of queer porn stars straight clips made to order) i could sue them?
since these are not off the shelf clips, but cusotm made.
BRB gonna sew some of em NOW!
Do you mean, where actors take requests from the audience and enact those requests? I would be surprised if actors would be required to engage in any kind of physical activity they found distasteful, and I would be surprised as a porn site that would refuse to allow an actor to engage in an activity the actor was agreeable to.
By comparison, a couple having a wedding is asking a baker to bake a cake. The process of baking the cake does not change much between the couple being gay and straight, AFAICT.
I get that english is not your first language, but why do you often spell the same word multiple ways in the same post? Just curious.