What's new

The Biden Administration and All Things Politics

The Biden administrations policy of playing nice and generous with the fundamentalist Iranian regime has certainly yielded awesome results.
Good point. Iranian fundamentalists are normally nice, calm, and predictable folks who are all about peace and love. But Biden has changed them.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Good point. Iranian fundamentalists are normally nice, calm, and predictable folks who are all about peace and love. But Biden has changed them.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
What’s funny is that Biden is criticized by the right for being too soft on Iran. Despite Trump tearing up the nuclear arms agreement without any replacement (that would’ve required understanding policy and making policy. Not exactly his strengths). Yet he’ll be criticized for being too hard on Iran too. Basically, whatever Biden is for, the right will be against. Just as we’ve seen with the right destroying the immigration bill and Ukrainian military aid.
 
Are these folks really looking to improve the situation at the border or are they merely looking for an issue to demagogue against so they can win an election in 2024?

Here we have two big issues, immigration at the border that Repubs have supposedly cared sooooo much about AND Ukrainian military aid to fight a genocidal war against a dictator. And Repubs have decided to block both in order to worsen things hoping that the chaos can be blamed on Biden.

Nice


View: https://x.com/acyn/status/1754660764340637998?s=46&t=QT7YFlZ_IlHq81PpZAhKgw
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Red
Are these folks really looking to improve the situation at the border or are they merely looking for an issue to demagogue against so they can win an election in 2024?
Both. The situation at the border cannot be improved with Biden in office. Biden *IS* the problem. No new legislation is needed. All the laws to close the border are already in place and have been for a long time. The Biden Administration has instructed those laws not be enforced. That is what the impeachment of Alejandro Mayorkas is about.

The Senate bill won't change the Biden Administration choosing to not enforce border laws because the bill has a provision saying the President has the power to suspend any entrance denial provisions of the bill if he thinks it in the national interest. However if Biden loses the election, the next President will find that his hands are tied for three years from closing the giant hole this bill has carved. The Senate bill even has a provision requiring all challenges to its constitutionality be adjudicated by the DC Circuit courts where Trump and the state of Texas are reviled.
 
Here’s what it’s all about, no matter how much bs get tossed out claiming otherwise. Pay no attention to the bs……When Johnson tells reporters “of course Trump is not calling the shots”, he’s lying. We must know by now that Trump will always put himself first, and his country wherever it’s convenient to him. And we should understand that the Republican Party is not willing to put their country first. They are only interested in saving their own arses, and saving their own party. Well, can’t really blame them entirely, they are only human. But, stuck between a rock and a hard place, because they must maintain Trump’s base, they nonetheless have concluded that means adopting their un-American position. Trump wants our “existential crisis at the border” delayed for at least a year, until he’s in the Oval Office again, and, of course, we know he wants Putin to win in Ukraine, which Johnson and company apparently have decided is OK after all….


“The draft agreement offers little to nothing on major Democratic priorities: no pathway to citizenship for long-term undocumented immigrants, only the slightest increase in legal immigration. The Democrats traded away most of their own policy wish list. In return, they want an end to the mood of crisis at the border, plus emergency defense aid for Ukraine and Israel”

So if no deal results, what truths will we learn from this?

The first is that Republicans don’t really care all that much about the situation at the border. A real “existential threat” cannot wait for some later date. People who perceive an existential threat don’t delay. In fact, a good many Republican legislators are very happy to allow a continuing flow of laborers across the border.

A second truth regard what Republican priorities really are. When Mike Johnson was elevated to the House speakership, he claimed that he genuinely wanted to help Ukraine but that aid had to wait until Congress passed new laws to harden the U.S. southern border. He wrote to President Joe Biden as recently as December 5 that further aid to Ukraine was “dependent upon enactment of transformative change to our nation’s border security laws.” When Senate negotiators produced exactly what Johnson said he wanted—a transformative bill that Congress could enact—he responded by reversing his demands. Johnson no longer wants any law at all. But one thing is constant: no aid to Ukraine—which suggests that “no aid to Ukraine,” not “defend the border,” is the true priority here.

A third truth is suggested by the angry reaction of House Republicans to the work of Senate Republicans: The very act of negotiation is mistrusted. Along with their speaker, House Republicans radically altered their position from “there must be a new law” to “there must be no new law,” and from “the president must sign our bill exactly as we wrote it” to “the president must act unilaterally by executive authority only.” How does anyone negotiate with a House majority that can so abruptly and totally pivot? The true goal revealed is failure and chaos.


And this points to a fourth truth, maybe the most important one of all. Donald Trump has sold his supporters the dangerous fantasy that democratic politics can be replaced by one man’s will. No need for distasteful compromises. No need to reckon with the concerns and interests of people who disagree with House Republicans. Just somehow return Trump to the presidency: He’ll bark; the system will obey.

Of course, such fantasies have no basis in reality. As the Cato Institute reported last November:

The Biden Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has removed a higher percentage of arrested border crossers in its first two years than the Trump DHS did over its last two years. Moreover, migrants were more likely to be released after a border arrest under President Trump than under President Biden. In absolute terms, the Biden DHS is removing 3.5 times as many people per month as the Trump DHS did.
 
Last edited:
Both. The situation at the border cannot be improved with Biden in office. Biden *IS* the problem. No new legislation is needed. All the laws to close the border are already in place and have been for a long time. The Biden Administration has instructed those laws not be enforced. That is what the impeachment of Alejandro Mayorkas is about.

The Senate bill won't change the Biden Administration choosing to not enforce border laws because the bill has a provision saying the President has the power to suspend any entrance denial provisions of the bill if he thinks it in the national interest. However if Biden loses the election, the next President will find that his hands are tied for three years from closing the giant hole this bill has carved. The Senate bill even has a provision requiring all challenges to its constitutionality be adjudicated by the DC Circuit courts where Trump and the state of Texas are reviled.

If we really wanted to stop what really has become an invasion in terms of the staggering numbers illegally coming into our country we could announce that anyone caught trying to cross illegally would be shot on sight and follow through with the policy. Illegal crossings would dry up overnight. Then we could put funds toward speeding up the process to allow immigrants in legally.
 
When Senate negotiators produced exactly what Johnson said he wanted
Red, you read such brain rot. This article is lie after lie after lie. The Republicans did not delay on an issue they wanted to see solved, they quickly passed a bill to solve it. It is HR-2. It closes the border now and provides extra funding to do so. HR-2 is what Mike Johnson said he wanted and the Senate bill is about as far from that as can be.

  • Claims the House Republicans delayed is a lie. They passed HR-2.
  • Claims the House Republicans don't want to see the border closed is a lie. They passed HR-2.
  • Claims they were taking orders from Trump is a lie. They passed HR-2.
  • Claims the Senate produced exactly what Mike Johnson said he wanted is a lie. What they want is HR-2.

 
“I’ve never seen anything like it,” Senator Brian Schatz (D-HI) wrote. “They literally demanded specific policy, got it, and then killed it.”

Foreign affairs journalist Anne Applebaum reflected on the teetering national security measure and wrote: “People will die, today, because of the cynical game played by the American Republican party. Their irresponsibility is breathtaking.”

Foreign affairs specialist Tom Nichols of The Atlantic wrote: “Letting Ukraine fall because of [Republicans’] cultish loyalty to Trump will be a betrayal that will stain America forever—and probably end up pulling us into a fight for Europe later. This is one of the rare moments when the path to disaster is clearly marked and avoidable.”

Former representative Liz Cheney (R-WY) summed up the day’s crisis over the national security measure: “On Trump’s orders, Republicans in Congress are rejecting the border security deal. They’re also abandoning America’s allies in Ukraine. Trump and the [Republicans] are losing the war on purpose in an inexcusable betrayal that will strengthen America’s enemies for years to come”.

 
“All indications are this bill won’t even move forward to the Senate floor. Why? A simple reason: Donald Trump. Because Donald Trump thinks it’s bad for him politically,” Biden said in remarks from the State Dining Room.

“He’d rather weaponize this issue than actually solve it. So for the last 24 hours, he’s done nothing, I’m told, but reach out to Republicans in the House and the Senate and threaten them and try to intimidate them to vote against this proposal,” the president said. “And looks like they’re caving.”

“Frankly, they owe it to the American people to show some spine and do what they know to be right,” he added.

 
just another day in US presidential politics. One candidate applies to have the law not apply to anything he does wrong. The other one mumbles about when he met with long dead Franky Mitterand of France at the G7 just a few years back. Carry on
 
just another day in US presidential politics. One candidate applies to have the law not apply to anything he does wrong. The other one mumbles about when he met with long dead Franky Mitterand of France at the G7 just a few years back. Carry on
Can someone Google translate this for me? What the hell is he even talking about?
 
“I’ve never seen anything like it,” Senator Brian Schatz (D-HI) wrote. “They literally demanded specific policy, got it, and then killed it.”

Foreign affairs journalist Anne Applebaum reflected on the teetering national security measure and wrote: “People will die, today, because of the cynical game played by the American Republican party. Their irresponsibility is breathtaking.”

Foreign affairs specialist Tom Nichols of The Atlantic wrote: “Letting Ukraine fall because of [Republicans’] cultish loyalty to Trump will be a betrayal that will stain America forever—and probably end up pulling us into a fight for Europe later. This is one of the rare moments when the path to disaster is clearly marked and avoidable.”

Former representative Liz Cheney (R-WY) summed up the day’s crisis over the national security measure: “On Trump’s orders, Republicans in Congress are rejecting the border security deal. They’re also abandoning America’s allies in Ukraine. Trump and the [Republicans] are losing the war on purpose in an inexcusable betrayal that will strengthen America’s enemies for years to come”.

Repubs forcing America to abandon Ukraine is easily the greatest foreign policy debacle of my lifetime, and I’ve seen a few awful ones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red
Thriller aka the worlds only living brain donor might want to consult with a plastic surgeon about cleaning up his face which has had all that egg on it for so long before he tries to figure out which bit of google cut and paste he regurgitates as an opinion.
 
just another day in US presidential politics. One candidate applies to have the law not apply to anything he does wrong. The other one mumbles about when he met with long dead Franky Mitterand of France at the G7 just a few years back. Carry on
Those are the same candidate.
 
Can someone Google translate this for me? What the hell is he even talking about?
Trump is claiming Presidential immunity in court, and Trump talked about a meeting with long-dead Mitterand. @Douchebag K is so committed to the 'Biden is suffering dementia' fiction, he misattributed Trump's statement about Mitterand to Biden.
 
Top