Search results

We were actually 28th in 3pt attempts, 23rd in 3pt makes, and tied for 8th with Houston in 3pt percentage. (LINK) Who's to say if our percentage would have remained as high if we had have taken more attempts.

I guess it depends who else is on the team. If we bring in a one of (Teague, Bledsoe, Jack, etc) and a couple of solid vets to play on the bench, I agree. If we go with the C4 with 3 rookies and some salary-relief castoffs, then I think we may be participating in the Wiggins sweepstakes.

With the Core 4, Marvin, Evans, Carroll, Tomic and 3 rookies from the draft, that would put us as 11 players. Now add a couple of players that we take from teams (for future picks) who need cap relief. I think that's a team 'competing' for one of the worst records. Losing would be because of...

I flipped to the game last night and thought "Wow, Mikki Moore is still playing". His sample size in the playoffs is small, but in March and April whenever he got minutes, he put up some big numbers. I'd make him an offer.

I actually think that this lineup would be competitive -- we would not be in tank mode. Question... how do we get Gasol in the senario? Is he an amnesty pick-up?

According to ESPN, Landry has a player option. And as for Korver, he's been a starter in Atlanta. I'm not sure if he'd want to be 3rd string here. I like the other choices though.

Can you imagine what might have happened had the Jazz signed Tony Parker instead of Rahul Lopez? Stockton may have stayed on a little longer, playing fewer minutes as Parker developed. With Parker here, Malone may have stayed and retired as a Jazz player. We would have had the point guard to...

What 'Hashpipe'?

50-16 free throws for the Lakers against Golden State last night and a 2 point win for the Lakers. Just saying... I voted for the Jazz, but probably would have gone with the cheese option.

As a season ticket holder (share 50%), I hate to attend a game and watch the Jazz lose. But I voted lottery because like the majority here, I want to see a rebuild with the C4, and this article makes me think that if the Jazz have playoff success, we could see the status quo next year...

In an interview on 1280 with Dave Friedman a week or so ago he said that with the flexibility the Jazz have, they don't necessarily have to draft a player that would play this year. Did anyone else hear the interview?

Maybe I'm wrong, but I thought Carroll didn't dress for the Memphis game.

I bought 20 individual games during the 83-84 season. Then I got season tickets in the 84-85 season. I've had full or shared season tickets ever since. About 10 years ago I scaled back to 20 games a year.

The name of the team gets you a good Scrabble score.

Walter Palmer was a second round pick, albeit a higher pick at 33. Still, I don't think we should be any more disappointed in him that say Junie 'Peanut Butter' Lewis, who was our second-round pick the previous year. I would bet that the Jazz have had more second round picks that turned out...

I disagree with Chris Morris, because I thought he did help the team in the playoff runs. I agree with Snyder. Also Morris Almond, Quincy Lewis, Luther Wright, Curtis Borchard, Jose Ortiz, Kosta Koufus, Raul Lopez (because we could have taken Parker). And I'd have to add CJ Miles.

Some other 'columnist' from BR had the Jazz ranked 21st in his post, I mean 'article' yesterday. I think this post from realgm is a more interesting post of random people's opinions of how the Jazz will do this year. Most of the posters had the Jazz not making the playoffs.

Murphy?

I've been to a Clippers game back in the LA Sports Arena days (win) and a Lakers game back in the Forum days (loss). But as much as I hate having fans of opposing teams sitting near my at home games, I'd probably not go to another road game.

USA Today gave the Jazz an A.