Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
Trade him for Beal straight up....
https://www.eurohoops.net/en/acb/80...-honors/?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter
How old is this loser? Didn’t we draft him the same year we drafted boom bitches?
Trade him for Beal straight up....
https://www.eurohoops.net/en/acb/80...-honors/?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter
https://www.google.com/search?q=how...me..69i57j0.4575j1j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8How old is this loser? Didn’t we draft him the same year we drafted boom bitches?
My guess is the deal was either fully-guaranteed or partially guaranteed enough to put them over the luxury?MCW traded to Chicago because his contract was going to be guaranteed at 5 pm. Houston sent cash. They reportedly did it to avoid salary tax issues. They're getting a heavily protected second rounder that is unlikely to convey. Chicago is waiving MCW. Somebody explain this move to me. Why didn't Houston just waive him? Why are they sending money for a pick that won't convey?
My guess is the deal was either fully-guaranteed or partially guaranteed enough to put them over the luxury?
There's obviously a reason both teams did this, I'm mostly not sure why Chicago did it.
MCW traded to Chicago because his contract was going to be guaranteed at 5 pm. Houston sent cash. They reportedly did it to avoid salary tax issues. They're getting a heavily protected second rounder that is unlikely to convey. Chicago is waiving MCW. Somebody explain this move to me. Why didn't Houston just waive him? Why are they sending money for a pick that won't convey?
This was for luxury savings for Houston. So MCW's contract was $1.5 million. Houston sent MCW and probably around $2 million to Chicago for a 2nd rounder which is protected probably 55-60.
So pretty much, Chicago made $500,000 to save Houston $2 million. The pick will never be conveyed from Chicago to Houston because Chicago won't be one of the top 5 teams in the league this year.
The dollars are less than this from Chicago's standpoint because it is pro-rated and the league covers a portion of minimum deals... I read somewhere that Chicago only pays like $375k for MCW for the rest of the year.
Someone mentioned Chandler Parsons could be a signing option for Houston, which may actually be a decent fit.
I could see that. Memphis has to make a decision on him though. I don't think they have released him. There are some people who think they might hold onto him just in case his large expiring contract next year can help them. If it can't, they can waive and stretch him.
Unless he agrees on a buyout and leaves significant money on the table they won't waive him for the very reason you stated. i could see a swap of bad money deals (Biyombo, Mozgov, Knight) but Grizz really mismanaged this badly. Only way his value increases from complete rock bottom is by him playing... if he says he can play then play him... if he gets hurt then he get hurt. Someone mentioned his contract may not be insured. The insurance company that works with the NBA gets to pick like 10-12 contracts each year to not insure... but if he is cleared I don't think they get insurance money anyway. Weird deal.
MCW may just be the biggest bust to somehow win a ROY ever.
Based off everything I've read, they are stuck with the contract. Insurance can't take over. I highly doubt Parsons walks away from much if any money.
So if I'm Memphis, I try to trade him but you're only going to be able to trade him if you get almost identical 2019-20 salary back. No team is going to take his contract without sending an asset.
His contract is so bad, but I was really interested in eating his contract if we could have gotten that #4 pick from Memphis.
MCW may just be the biggest bust to somehow win a ROY ever.
I agree... That's why you just play him imo. If he played okayish and was able to stay healthy someone could talk themselves into a bad salary swap where Memphis gets maybe a lesser bad deal for him... orlando for like Mozgov and Simmons... but not playing him does nothing good for anyone.