What's new

2024 NBA Free Agency Thread

Im sure Brunson taking less money has nothing to do with CAA/NY/Brunson Family connections and there is nothing shady going on...
IDK but I'm sure it's much easier for a player to take less money when they already came a wealthy family from even just a relationship to money standpoint.

Rick Brunson would have to do something impressively illegal to get fired while Jalen is balling as well
 
And IMO this should not be celebrated and is a bad thing. The balance and fairness of the league kind of depends on max players getting their max money.
1000%. I dont see this as good at all and I dont believe for 1 sec dude is walking away from that money. He's just not getting it from the Knicks directly each year as an NBA basketball player. No one is give back $100m + to a for profit organization. Come on yall
 
1000%. I dont see this as good at all and I dont believe for 1 sec dude is walking away from that money. He's just not getting it from the Knicks directly each year as an NBA basketball player. No one is give back $100m + to a for profit organization. Come on yall
I think there is a chance that he actually does like the feeling of winning more than the feeling of extra millions sitting in his bank account.
 
IDK but I'm sure it's much easier for a player to take less money when they already came a wealthy family from even just a relationship to money standpoint.

Rick Brunson would have to do something impressively illegal to get fired while Jalen is balling as well
Most NBA players come from wealthy families nowadays.
 
I think there is a chance that he actually does like the feeling of winning more than the feeling of extra millions sitting in his bank account.
I get that feeling from Brunson as well.
Also, in the end he may recoup "loses" and then some.
Bc 3 yrs after this extension kicks in, when he's ~ 31, he'll have a player option and can sign a vet max deal of +400MM.
Type of guy who bets on himself and wins.
 
Most NBA players come from wealthy families nowadays.
Yeah, so I do wonder if the salary cap may not be quite as effective at dispersing talent as it continues. Like 10% of the league are "legacy" at this point, and it's increasing. Wealthy kids are more able to value prestige.

Like I still like it as a concept and am happy for him, and don't see this as much of a worry because it's still a unique thing
 
Yeah, so I do wonder if the salary cap may not be quite as effective at dispersing talent as it continues. Like 10% of the league are "legacy" at this point, and it's increasing. Wealthy kids are more able to value prestige.

Like I still like it as a concept and am happy for him, and don't see this as much of a worry because it's still a unique thing
It wont be a trend, but that's the issue, it gives the Knicks a huge advantage on top of being NYK.
 
Maxing on the renegotiation gets the Jazz just over the salary floor. The Jazz will then sit by the phones for teams to call them to rent out that remaining space.

Because of that, I think the Dunn S&T won’t happen (unless the Jazz get something back that they shouldn’t since it compromises the potential return value on the remainder of the cap space).
So uh, it’s not Dunn?
 
Yeah, as much as we personally may admire it, this type of thing would tend to work far more to the advantage of the markets players want to be in than to the smaller markets.
From a lifestyle and the marketing potential income is on an entirely different level. If you're an Austin Reeves in Los Angeles you're more likely to be discussed on ESPN than being a Alperen Sengun in Houston, and Houstons not small.

The NBA board of directors is composed of like 25/30 people who consider themselves "small market", I'm sure we'd add a veto option for contacts deemed unfairly below market below if it becomes a problem
 
Yeah, as much as we personally may admire it, this type of thing would tend to work far more to the advantage of the markets players want to be in than to the smaller markets.
Thats very true. I will still continue to like and support dudes who take less money to increase the chances of on court success though. Even if it doesn't help my team. I like the concept.
 
Record breaking numbers in Phoenix
The Suns are the first $400M team in payroll
Salaries: $223M
Projected tax: $198M

Ouch
 
Saw this from Woj: “Brunson's study of championship organizations and franchise stars -- Patrick Mahomes’ Kansas City Chiefs, Tom Brady’s New England Patriots and the Derek Jeter New York Yankees -- gave him a blueprint for MVP-level players who structured contracts to give their teams the best chances at sustainable title runs.”
 
Wow! What a badass. This may be the first time we have seen a star choose team building over money. Some guys have taken small discounts but usually they want that bag and then complain that their team is struggling to put a strong roster around them. Watch Bridges make a similar concession.
Stockton did the same, and with far less money on the table, hence a bigger impact relatively for him personally, to get Malone a bigger contract. With hundreds of millions involved it’s not that big a deal to take less when the consolation prize is A ****ING HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS.
 
Jazz mentioned here as part of LAL's failed trade efforts. If it's not Lauri, I'm guessing they tried to get Sexton. Could be a Kessler team if AD keeps complaining about being a 5....I also think they could be a Collins/Clarkson team.

What’s clear from Las Vegas, however, is that many in NBA circles believe the Lakers must upgrade their roster to have a chance at a deep playoff run. In polling more than a dozen front-office executives, coaches, scouts and agents attending the NBA Summer League, most pegged the Lakers as a likely Play-In team, with seeds ranging from fifth to 10th in the West. None view the team’s current version as capable of winning a championship. Several noted a lack of two-way wings and the hole at backup center behind Davis as reasons for pessimism.

Most notably, almost all expect the Lakers to make a trade at some point ahead of the Feb. 7, 2025 trade deadline.

The Lakers’ inactivity has not been due to a lack of trying. They struck out with Klay Thompson, were unable to land other impact free agents like Jonas Valančiūnas and DeMar DeRozan, and have failed thus far to find common ground in trade talks with Portland, Brooklyn, Utah, Toronto and Orlando. Now, according to league and team sources, the Lakers are expected to remain patient in their quest to improve their roster.

One of the reasons the Lakers have been unable to make any signings and had to explore trades is that four roster holdovers who were given second-year player options last summer — D’Angelo Russell, Christian Wood, Jaxson Hayes and Cam Reddish — opted in due to their performances last season and the tight free-agent market. The latter three players, in particular, and the presence of developmental projects like Jalen Hood-Schifino, Maxwell Lewis and Bronny James, have created a rough backend to the Lakers’ roster. The team has several players who appear unlikely to contribute meaningfully next season and wouldn’t be in the rotations of most playoff teams.


As things stand, the Lakers have a full roster of 15 players with guaranteed contracts. They’re also roughly $45,000 under the second apron of nearly $189 million. That combination means they can’t sign any players in free agency or add any additional players (or salary) in any trades. They have two first-round picks to trade (2029 and 2031), as well as multiple first-round swaps and second-round picks.

The most straightforward way the Lakers can add talent is to make a consolidation trade. They can either send out more players than they receive in a deal or salary-dump Reddish, Wood and/or Hayes, along with a second-round pick or two, onto a team with roster and financial flexibility. If the Lakers traded two minimum players (Wood, Hayes and Reddish would qualify), they’d have enough room under the second apron to sign a player to the $5.2 million taxpayer midlevel exception. They could also add a player in a trade or sign player(s) to minimum contracts.

 
Jazz mentioned here as part of LAL's failed trade efforts. If it's not Lauri, I'm guessing they tried to get Sexton. Could be a Kessler team if AD keeps complaining about being a 5....I also think they could be a Collins/Clarkson team.



I would much rather trade Kessler and Sexton than Lauri to ensure the tank while giving the kids something to hold onto.

BTW: Who the hell are the Lakers supposed to sign with the taxpayer MLE that will make any difference?
 
I would much rather trade Kessler and Sexton than Lauri to ensure the tank while giving the kids something to hold onto.

BTW: Who the hell are the Lakers supposed to sign with the taxpayer MLE that will make any difference?

The only decent players left are Tyus (who would be good for them), Achuiwa, and Okoro. What makes Jazz a good trade partner is that we can eat extra salary so they can use their full MLE….but Tyus is prob the only guy worth it to them.

If we’re not trading Lauri, I don’t think it’s a terrible idea to take the pile of stuff from NYK for Kessler and then trade Sexton to the Lakers.

Not gonna get ideal value for either though.
 
Back
Top