Holy God, you're a moran. Chamberlain was a ****ing selfish loser.
Wooden was talking about college. Again, you're basing your beliefs on the numbers? Did you see these guys play against each other from 1976-78 when Walton was the league's best all-around player? He was MVP in 1978.
What made Walton so good was his all-around team play, fantastic passer. He was like Bird in the sense that he made his teammates around him better. He wasn't about getting lots of points and putting up great stats. He was about winning.
About Chamberlain and Jabbar. Did you see the finals series. Chamberlain was well past his prime, yet who won -- the Lakers. Why because Chamberlain dominated on the boards. Statistics be damned. You need to see games to make an accurate appraisal. I saw them on TV, these matchups I'm describing.
Yeah, Jordan was so selfish that he won six rings and helped elevate the play of his teammates. Wilt, who was so ****ing great, won a whopping two and did nothing to truly make those around him better. I'm going to guess that you've never read anything about him as a player though.
I never said Walton sucked. He won an MVP. Kareem won 6
Kareem wasn't about winning? He has more rings than Bird and Walton combined. Oh and when he was at UCLA they went 88-2 and won 3 NCAA titles.
If Kareem was all about stats as opposed to Walton why didn't Walton average more assists?
No I didn't watch. So I won't comment on Wilt vs. Kareem.
Kareem 38000 reasons why but i think he was the best ever 6 rings and mvps. Plus hes in a Bruce Lee movie a episode of Simpsons and Baseketball. One of the coolest fights ever.
From my Damn phone
Why do you have call people names when you disagree -- it's so f'n immature.
I really hate the guy, but Kobe Bryant has the rings, the stats, and the competitive drive. Plus, he's a defensive glove, a bitch, a rapists, and has hit more big shots than Robert Horry. If he's not second to Jordan, I don't know who is.