They had Hayward for 6 minutes...how do you know they are more exciting without him? lolz
Tatum gets to play a lot.
They had Hayward for 6 minutes...how do you know they are more exciting without him? lolz
Tatum gets to play a lot.
Eh.
I said exciting. To me seeing Haywad lead them to ECF isn't exciting. Watching Tatum is. And they'll be better in the long run with Tatum getting playing time.
Yeah, that means you have a boner for rookies. Nothing wrong with that, but for people who enjoy watching good basketball disagree.
And it's not like Tatum couldn't get ample minutes with Hayward. You know they started Tatum/Brown/Hayward, right? They were all going to get a lot of minutes. It's the bench guys who are getting more minutes because of the Hayward injury. But maybe you think watching Daniel Theiss and Semi Ojeleye is more exciting than Hayward, cuz you know, rookies.
To me, prime doesn't translate to a span of years where the player will be his best. It means, at which age said player will play his best. I'm saying this, because IMO, we haven't seen the best or Rudy.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/2aa0r2/study_at_what_age_an_nba_player_reaches_his_peak/
This is a pretty cool read some dude put together about NBA players and their prime age in the NBA. Some interesting things come to mind when reading it.
God this thread is garbage.
I'd take this more serious if you were able to tell the difference between Ingles and Gobert and not give Gobert **** for what Ingles did - multiple times.
I remembered a play incorrectly in the heat of the game, my bad.