https://freethoughtblogs.com/stderr/2020/01/20/tacticality-dese-gun-nutz/
Has one picture with two people pointing their guns in the wrong direction.
Has one picture with two people pointing their guns in the wrong direction.
Just an FYI, you can support the second amendment and still believe that we need stricter gun laws.Dangerous times when supporters of the 2nd amendment are lumped in with supporters of a highly unconstitutional president.
Again it’s a legit protest (in fear of Virginia going down the road of forcible confiscation) stained by the many clowns that can be seen in the footage, who associate supporting the 2nd amendment with supporting Trump.Just an FYI, you can support the second amendment and still believe that we need stricter gun laws.
One of the most annoying things about conversations about guns is the stance that only people who believe in unfettered access to guns truly support the 2nd amendment.
The people marching in Virginia support a very particular interpretation of the second amendment, one that isn't shared by the majority of the country.
It's a nonsense fear, might as well be a fear of the boogeyman.Again it’s a legit protest (in fear of Virginia going down the road of forcible confiscation) stained by the many clowns that can be seen in the footage, who associate supporting the 2nd amendment with supporting Trump.
We’ll see how far they take it, both sides..It's a nonsense fear, might as well be a fear of the boogeyman.
Seems like these laws ENCOURAGE ramming vehicles into people? Why are Republicans passing these laws and what are their consequences?
![]()
Oklahoma passes a law that can protect drivers who run over protesters | CNN
Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt signed a bill Wednesday granting immunity to drivers who unintentionally injure or kill protesters while attempting to flee and which stiffens penalties for demonstrators who block public roadways, according to the Oklahoma State Legislature.www.cnn.com
Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t the white supremacist who killed Heather Heyer with his car claim he “was scared?” So under these types of laws, he’d be a free man right now? Why the hell are we doing this?
Zero minus the one that already happened?As usual, worded out of context. Why didn't you include this:
House Bill 1674 also states that drivers cannot be held criminally or civilly liable for killing or injuring a protestor if they are "fleeing from a riot," and there is "reasonable belief" that they are in danger. Both must be true to be given immunity.
So if people are throwing bricks and molotovs at your car, yes, you should be allowed to protect your family and make an attempt to get out of dodge. I predict there will be zero rammings.
Zero minus the one that already happened?