NAOS
Well-Known Member
Put it another way. A restrictive CBA means two things: 1) All salaries will be reduced across the board. 2) By consequence, Hamilton's 12.6 million dollar salary in year 2 is effectively that of a MAX player. Do you want to be paying Hamilton a MAX deal when you could theoretically put that money toward an actual MAX player?
when we're talking hypothetically, i.e. Rip as a max player vs. prototypical max player, then it doesn't look very good. And, I'll admit, it's far from ideal.
I'd have to take a look at potential free agents for that year before I could give you an honest answer. Perhaps I'm just too stung by the reality of rooting for a small market team to hold out for prototypical max player and therefore find this argument less consequential than if, say, I were a Laker fan.