What's new
By:

DL Goes To The League About Jazz Officiating

Saint Cy of JFC said:
Bet you he isnt complaining about all the missed moving screen calls on Rudy Gobert
Click to expand...

If you're going to call moving screens, call them equally on everyone.

Rudy is just getting away with what every other good screener gets away with.

So by all means, start policing screens better. I see zero problem with that, in fact i encourage it. Don't just have this disparity where Rudy's screens are called strict but then you have Draymond shuffling feet while Curry darts past him
 
dalamon said:
If you're going to call moving screens, call them equally on everyone.

Rudy is just getting away with what every other good screener gets away with.

So by all means, start policing screens better. I see zero problem with that, in fact i encourage it. Don't just have this disparity where Rudy's screens are called strict but then you have Draymond shuffling feet while Curry darts past him
Click to expand...

Exactly... I have never seen that one as lightly enforced as it is now. When they call it I laugh because the difference between the non call and the call is usually how the defender flops.
 
Stoked said:
The organization would pay it and not him anyways I'd bet.

I like how they did it as well. If you feel you have a legit complaint then you try and prove it.
Click to expand...

Not sure how they'd fine him... didn't criticize officials and analyze a specific call... just stated data and that they've had discussions.
 
Man I remember in those boozer/dwill days if anyone sneezed it was a whistle with Kobe going to the line, it was ridiculous. These days seems like it's Hardin that gets all those darling calls.
 
Supposedly Snyder was banging Linas Kleiza's GF while he coached him and that is one of the reason's he declared early for the draft. Supposedly Snyder showed up one day with a black eye because Kleiza caught him smashing his GF.
 
footawn said:
The whole thing quotes information that is supposedly publicly available.
Click to expand...

They discussed that the grading of the calls was provided to the teams, and there was speculation that since it was out to 30 teams, eventually would likely get leaded to the public.
 
The NBA has data to statistically test two important hypotheses:

(1) calls favor home teams ("rabbit ears"). If there is a statistically significant bias, how many points per game does this translate to? Does this bias fully explain home court advantage or are there other contributors?

(2) calls favor stars.

In the interest in transparency, this analysis should be reported.

They would not have to report the result of each call, just the overall findings of the study.
 
DL on Woj podcast pretty interesting

[Tweet]849884881962147840[/Tweet]

He says he has data to show that the officiating hasn't been equal to the Jazz.

It sounds like a big part of his sell to Hayward is him becoming a franchise legacy player.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top