What's new

Donald is about to go through some things...

Right. If there isn't evidence of wrongdoing, which of course there wouldn't be if trump were innocent, then why go through all the trouble of going to an appeals court to try to prevent these people from appearing in front of a grand jury? Maybe its because trump believes there is evidence of wrongdoing that these people could provide. That would be a good reason for trump to go this route. Im sure he is simply innocent however and is doing this for another reason entirely.
Eh, testimony to a grand jury is like talking to the police, it can only hurt you. The prosecutor is trying to clear a hurdle and if there is testimony that you don't think will be admissible at trial it makes sense to try to block it from a grand jury. We have these protections for the accused for a reason and using them is NOT an indication of guilt. Innocent people should use every avenue possible to protect themselves from prosecution every bit as much as a guilty person should.

I absolutely reject the notion that "If you haven't done anything wrong you have nothing to hide."
 
Right. If there isn't evidence of wrongdoing, which of course there wouldn't be if trump were innocent, then why go through all the trouble of going to an appeals court to try to prevent these people from appearing in front of a grand jury? Maybe its because trump believes there is evidence of wrongdoing that these people could provide. That would be a good reason for trump to go this route. Im sure he is simply innocent however and is doing this for another reason entirely.
Watch JCS. Watch Audit The Audit. Watch something to give you a clue. You do not talk to law enforcement even when you believe you are innocent. You are failing your kids if you do not teach them this. Even retired police investigators will tell you not to talk to police investigators.

A police investigator's job is not to solve crimes or find the criminal responsible. A police investigator's job is to gather as much evidence as possible and pass it on to prosecutors.

A prosecutor's job is not to solve crimes or find the criminal responsible. A prosecutor's job is to compile the evidence in a way that it can be used in a trial.

A grand jury's job is not to solve crimes or find the criminal responsible. A grand jury's job is evaluate the prosecutor's work to confirm if it meets a threshold to proceed.

As someone who is accused, it is never in your best interest to give information of any kind to police investigators, prosecutors, or grand juries. NEVER. Those parties are not capable of finding you innocent. As someone who is accused, you give your evidence of your innocence to your lawyer and your lawyer will use that to advocate on your behalf. That is how our system works.
 
Last edited:
tweeting out pictures of you hitting the prosecutor with a bat, is usually a good show of innocence. Typically slandering the prosecutor, the judge, the judge’s wife, the judge’s daughter, is very helpful and something an innocent person would do. Just like calling for GA officials to cook up the exact number of votes you need and organizing an insurrection to prevent the certification of votes is what an innocent person would do. Trump is always innocent. He’s never the aggressor. Always the victim.

IMG_7208.jpeg
 
Watch JCS. Watch Audit The Audit. Watch something to give you a clue. You do not talk to law enforcement even when you believe you are innocent. You are failing your kids if you do not teach them this. Even retired police investigators will tell you not to talk to police investigators.

A police investigator's job is not to solve crimes or find the criminal responsible. A police investigator's job is to gather as much evidence as possible and pass it on to prosecutors.

A prosecutor's job is not to solve crimes or find the criminal responsible. A prosecutor's job is to compile the evidence in a way that it can be used in a trial.

A grand jury's job is not to solve crimes or find the criminal responsible. A grand jury's job is evaluate the prosecutor's work to confirm if it meets a threshold to proceed.

As someone who is accused, it is never in your best interest to give information of any kind to police investigators, prosecutors, or grand juries. NEVER. Those parties are not capable of finding you innocent. As someone who is accused, you give your evidence of your innocence to your lawyer and your lawyer will use that to advocate on your behalf. That is how our system works.
JCS is head and shoulders the best true crime, criminal psychology, interrogation analysis on planet Earth. Period. End. Of. Story. Everyone should watch at least some of it and the one with the innocent guy especially.



Audit the Audit is also gold standard content where they analyze "auditor" content. Give you a good idea what the "First Amendment Auditor" community is up to without having to watch a bunch of ********.
 
JCS is head and shoulders the best true crime, criminal psychology, interrogation analysis on planet Earth. Period. End. Of. Story. Everyone should watch at least some of it and the one with the innocent guy especially.



Audit the Audit is also gold standard content where they analyze "auditor" content. Give you a good idea what the "First Amendment Auditor" community is up to without having to watch a bunch of ********.

Even the obviously innocent can find themselves under arrest.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMMYYajwLms
 
JCS is head and shoulders the best true crime, criminal psychology, interrogation analysis on planet Earth. Period. End. Of. Story. Everyone should watch at least some of it and the one with the innocent guy especially.



Audit the Audit is also gold standard content where they analyze "auditor" content. Give you a good idea what the "First Amendment Auditor" community is up to without having to watch a bunch of ********.

I agree with both of your posts. Love the content that they both put out.
 
Historically our justice system has investigated crimes to find individuals responsible. Now it is investigating individuals to find a crime.
This is almost charmingly naive, like a kid finding out that milk comes from cows. Our justice system has always involved investigating individuals to find a crime; it's usually been individuals that you don't notice or care about.

In this prosecution, the government started with investigating an individual, not a crime. We know this because Alvin Bragg said he was going to do exactly that when he was elected. Then to get around statute of limitations issues, the government used a "novel legal theory" that has NEVER been used before on anyone.
Standard prosecutorial behavior.

I have no love for Trump, but as a registered big 'L' Libertarian, I do have a problem with our government breaking safeguards that were put in place to protect average people. Sure, Trump isn't "average people", but once broken it becomes easier to break the safeguards again, and again.
These safeguards have never protected average people, only the ones who can afford good lawyers.
 
JCS is head and shoulders the best true crime, criminal psychology, interrogation analysis on planet Earth. Period. End. Of. Story. Everyone should watch at least some of it and the one with the innocent guy especially.



Audit the Audit is also gold standard content where they analyze "auditor" content. Give you a good idea what the "First Amendment Auditor" community is up to without having to watch a bunch of ********.

Yeah I am not a fan of the auditing ********. I think going out to provoke a response and lying continually about why you are there - "I am gathering film for an article I am writing/video I am making/news story I am putting together" - is just slimy and disgusting. Do cops need to be outed for bad behavior? Abso-****ing-lutely. But not by baiting them ceaselessly into manufactured "confrontations". I saw a video once posted from a cops body cam where he showed the full interaction with an auditor and the dude engaged in behavior that was borderline abusive, with bad language, and even threats, until another officer finally tried to run the guy off. The auditors video of course was edited to just show the cop being mean. The other video showed the auditor was RELENTLESSLY an *******. Anyone, idgaf who you are or what you job, would have gotten pissed at the whole thing. Yeah the cop should not have taken the bait, but man the auditing **** can just get out of control. If cops are sometimes the worst humanity has to offer, auditors are not that far behind.

At least be straight up about it. "Hey I am videoing because it is my constitutional right, and I am on public property, so there is nothing you can do about it." Enough of the "Oh I am a journalist" ********. No, you are just an instigator for da clicks and views. At least ****ing have the guts to admit it. "Hey I am here to video you guys until you give me a reaction I can put on youtube to show how crappy cops are." Own it. Just cowards and cowardly behavior really, impfho.
 
Yeah I am not a fan of the auditing ********. I think going out to provoke a response and lying continually about why you are there - "I am gathering film for an article I am writing/video I am making/news story I am putting together" - is just slimy and disgusting. Do cops need to be outed for bad behavior? Abso-****ing-lutely. But not by baiting them ceaselessly into manufactured "confrontations". I saw a video once posted from a cops body cam where he showed the full interaction with an auditor and the dude engaged in behavior that was borderline abusive, with bad language, and even threats, until another officer finally tried to run the guy off. The auditors video of course was edited to just show the cop being mean. The other video showed the auditor was RELENTLESSLY an *******. Anyone, idgaf who you are or what you job, would have gotten pissed at the whole thing. Yeah the cop should not have taken the bait, but man the auditing **** can just get out of control. If cops are sometimes the worst humanity has to offer, auditors are not that far behind.

At least be straight up about it. "Hey I am videoing because it is my constitutional right, and I am on public property, so there is nothing you can do about it." Enough of the "Oh I am a journalist" ********. No, you are just an instigator for da clicks and views. At least ****ing have the guts to admit it. "Hey I am here to video you guys until you give me a reaction I can put on youtube to show how crappy cops are." Own it. Just cowards and cowardly behavior really, impfho.
Agreed.

I absolutely hate some of the stuff "auditors" do. I especially hate when they think they get to litigate their traffic stop with the officer on the side of the road and seem to think that the cop needs their approval to continue with the stop. I hate when people say the same exact thing over and over, so when they shout "Am I being detained, or am I free to go?" multiple times and get told in no uncertain terms that they ARE being detained yet feel the need to ask again and again anyway.

They are trying to generate content but their real goal is to goad the cop into violating their rights so that they can sue.
 
Yep. The justice department should be prosecuting law breakers by first asking what political party they are a part of then taking turns. Like if they prosecute a republican and find that another republican has broken a law then they cant prosecute the 2nd one because it has to equal and fair. Have to go after a democrat next. Then another republican. Then another democrat. Its the way the system was designed.
Elon musk is just so smart. To be honest Musk should probably be the supreme judge of the country and decide who get prosecuted for what and who is guilty or innocent. Its really the only fair way to do things.
 
Did that break an election law, or were rcords falsified to cover it up?

Why do you want children to be exposed to Hunter Biden's penis? Groomer.
 

The Atlantic’s Peter Wehner just last week in a scathing account of Donald Trump described the former president as a “mob boss.”

“That comparison turns out to have been insulting to mob bosses everywhere,” the conservative columnist wrote in his most recent article that was published Wednesday.

Just in the last week, the embattled ex-president launched attacks against a judge hearing his case and his family members and posted a photo on his Truth Social account of him holding a bat next to a photo showing the head of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

“Republican officials, whether they appreciate and admire Trump or are fearful of and submissive to him, continue to stand by him. They recognize that he is the most dominant and popular figure in the Republican Party. And they are stuck with him.”

"Publicly, they are, almost to a person, on his side. The tribe demands no less of its members. To do otherwise is to suffer the fate of the intrepid Liz Cheney,” Wehner writes.

“The Trump era has been illuminating in this regard. In the past, wondering just how far a party would go in defense of its leader was a matter of speculation. But Trump has moved this question from the realm of speculation to the realm of reality. The GOP has hitched its wagon to Trump, and he is leading them to places even they never imagined. A grotesque man presides over a grotesque party.”
 

In an interview on a Russian state-TV channel, Viktor Bout—an international arms dealer made infamous after his portrayal by Nicolas Cage in the 2005 film "Lord of War"—told a reporter he had sent a telegram to Trump warning him of an imminent threat to his life and urging him to flee to Russia for safety.

The threat against Trump's life, Bout suggested, is not from an assassin or some unknown plot against him. Instead, he said, it comes from Trump's own government and is a result of the Manhattan district attorney's probe of allegations that Trump falsified business records to hide a hush money payment to former adult film star Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election.

"The legal process which has now begun in New York won't just end in Donald Trump being convicted and barred from the [2024] election," Bout said on the Russia-24 news channel.

"Most likely he will simply be eliminated there," he continued. "Therefore, I think it's in the best interests of all of humanity and primarily all of the American people to invite Donald Trump here, to Russia, to give him security and protection here so that he leads this uprising against the globalists and, most importantly, does not allow the elimination of the American people."

LOL
 
So of course trumps dumb *** come out and says how people were crying in court when he was being arraigned. And also of course, he was lying. Surprise surprise.


Former President Trump’s claim to a Fox News anchor that New York court employees were “crying” and apologizing for his arraignment on felony charges is “absolute BS” and doesn’t remotely resemble what took place, a law enforcement source familiar with the details of what transpired that day told Yahoo News.

“Zero,” said the source when asked how much truth there was to Trump’s colorful account. “There were zero people crying. There were zero people saying ‘I’m sorry.’”

Trump offered his version of events in an interview with the Fox News host Tucker Carlson that aired Tuesday night.

“When I went to the courthouse, which is also a prison in a sense, they signed me in, and I’ll tell you, people were crying,” Trump told Carlson. “People that work there, professionally work there, that have no problems putting in murderers, and they see everybody. It’s a tough, tough place, and they were crying. They were actually crying. They said, ‘I’m sorry.’ They said, '2024, sir. 2024.’ And tears were pouring down their eyes.”

In fact, the source said, aside from his lawyers and Secret Service agents, Trump interacted only with a handful of district attorney employees at the courthouse and had extremely limited exposure with others during his arraignment last Tuesday in lower Manhattan.

MORE LIES

Yet during Tuesday night’s interview, Carlson never challenged or pushed back against any of Trump’s assertions, including an unusual exchange about the Biden administration’s alleged failure to rescue German shepherds from Afghanistan.

“They left everything,” Trump said of Biden’s pullout from Afghanistan. “They left in the dark of night. They left the lights on. They left the dogs, by the way.”

“They left the dogs?” Carlson asked.

“They left the dogs," Trump responded. "You know, the dog lovers, and you know there are a lot of them. I love dogs. You love dogs. One of the first questions I got was, ‘What did they do with the dogs?' Mostly German shepherds. They left them.

In her memoir, “Raising Trump,” the former president’s ex-wife Ivana wrote that Trump “was not a dog fan” and often expressed hostility to her poodle, Chappy.


Trump is such and idiotic douche. He cant speak without lying.
 
So of course trumps dumb *** come out and says how people were crying in court when he was being arraigned. And also of course, he was lying. Surprise surprise.


Former President Trump’s claim to a Fox News anchor that New York court employees were “crying” and apologizing for his arraignment on felony charges is “absolute BS” and doesn’t remotely resemble what took place, a law enforcement source familiar with the details of what transpired that day told Yahoo News.

“Zero,” said the source when asked how much truth there was to Trump’s colorful account. “There were zero people crying. There were zero people saying ‘I’m sorry.’”

Trump offered his version of events in an interview with the Fox News host Tucker Carlson that aired Tuesday night.

“When I went to the courthouse, which is also a prison in a sense, they signed me in, and I’ll tell you, people were crying,” Trump told Carlson. “People that work there, professionally work there, that have no problems putting in murderers, and they see everybody. It’s a tough, tough place, and they were crying. They were actually crying. They said, ‘I’m sorry.’ They said, '2024, sir. 2024.’ And tears were pouring down their eyes.”

In fact, the source said, aside from his lawyers and Secret Service agents, Trump interacted only with a handful of district attorney employees at the courthouse and had extremely limited exposure with others during his arraignment last Tuesday in lower Manhattan.

MORE LIES

Yet during Tuesday night’s interview, Carlson never challenged or pushed back against any of Trump’s assertions, including an unusual exchange about the Biden administration’s alleged failure to rescue German shepherds from Afghanistan.

“They left everything,” Trump said of Biden’s pullout from Afghanistan. “They left in the dark of night. They left the lights on. They left the dogs, by the way.”

“They left the dogs?” Carlson asked.

“They left the dogs," Trump responded. "You know, the dog lovers, and you know there are a lot of them. I love dogs. You love dogs. One of the first questions I got was, ‘What did they do with the dogs?' Mostly German shepherds. They left them.

In her memoir, “Raising Trump,” the former president’s ex-wife Ivana wrote that Trump “was not a dog fan” and often expressed hostility to her poodle, Chappy.


Trump is such and idiotic douche. He cant speak without lying.
Well we have known for a long time he is a narcissistic psychopath, of that there is little doubt. Adding in pathological liar just fits. The narcissism would be debilitating to anyone not born with a silver spoon in their mouth. He is a product of luck of birth and extreme life-long privilege.
 
Back
Top