NAOS
Well-Known Member
I cried into my coke this morning, twice. Damn estrogen pills.
Sorry me calling you out upset you. Bro hug?
You're clearly the upset one.
How's your transition going?
I cried into my coke this morning, twice. Damn estrogen pills.
Sorry me calling you out upset you. Bro hug?
Hug me and find out. Just don't fall in love with me.
I don't date jerks.
Some questions:
Why George Lucas de Paula over Cotton. Seems like an uneccesary change only for the sake of making a change. COtton has earned it.
Why 10 deep when playoff rotations are not that deep? Usually 8-9 guys.
I see that Booker, Burks and Burke are MIA. You mention that you have no idea how this would happen. Did you look to see what range these players in the draft are going at? That might help you come up with some of your own ideas.
Why the desire to revamp our wings when you have Hayward, Hood, Burks and Millsap under contract? That is a nice collection. Who do you see as the weak link and why?
actual thought:
has any team ever had 5 first-round draft picks?
(this was asked waaaay back on the first page. It was your first actual reply)
actual thought:
has any team ever had 5 first-round draft picks?
(this was asked waaaay back on the first page. It was your first actual reply)
actual thought:
has any team ever had 5 first-round draft picks?
(this was asked waaaay back on the first page. It was your first actual reply)
5Booker (#12), RHJ (mid-first), Holmes (late-first), Jaiteh (late-first), De Paula (late-first)
5
player development would be a huge problem
Also, the contracts would be a huge problem (if they somehow managed to develop well enough to deserve another one)
Also, this is just plain bat**** crazy
5
player development would be a huge problem
Also, the contracts would be a huge problem (if they somehow managed to develop well enough to deserve another one)
Also, this is just plain bat**** crazy
-If every player with "late first" potential went in the first round there would be 50 first rounders.
-Yep, that's what you get with draft picks.
-Worrying about second contracts for rookies and bench guys(1 of these rookies isn't on the bench) isn't the best idea, all of them will never be re-signed by anyone.
-So if it were modified to say:
Milos/Exum
Hood/Burks
Hayward/RHJ
Favors/Looney(my preferred of the mid 1st PFs for #12)
Gobert/Jaiteh
would that be so ridiculously crazy? In that scenario we trade into the early 20's for RHJ (Burke/Booker/future picks, whatever), use our normal picks, and sign Milos. So basically two changes- No trading Burks so we don't pick D.Booker at 12 and instead go with Looney and don't need to grab Holmes later. And also no using other future assets to grab De Paula at the end of the first. Simple changes to make but comparable scenario(also highly feasible-whereas mine was indeed rather outlandish), instead of your "this is crazy" hyperbole.
I've never seen one person be so condescending. Actually pretty impressive.
I would like to apologize for that. Day is already a little crappy and I let people get under my skin a bit. Still wish people would look past the "5 picks" reaction and give their opinions on the basketball.