What's new

Following Potential 2025 Draftees

If you watched the video you would know. Best FEEL was an "almost mystical" intangible that represents how does that player use his tools, not so much what tools does he have.

The example was Giannis vs Caboclo and Stanley Johnson vs Devin Booker.
 
FEEL was more about processing speed, situational understanding of game time moments at an NBA level.

Jokic's court mapping, Halliburton's playmaking, Stephs depth perception, they didnt say it but Brunsons balance / scoring prowess / wiggle in the paint comes to mind.
 
If you watched the video you would know. Best FEEL was an "almost mystical" intangible that represents how does that player use his tools, not so much what tools does he have.

The example was Giannis vs Caboclo and Stanley Johnson vs Devin Booker.
I haven’t had time to watch but will later hopefully. How are Bookerand Johnson even relatable? Not similar styles at all.
 
FEEL was more about processing speed, situational understanding of game time moments at an NBA level.

Jokic's court mapping, Halliburton's playmaking, Stephs depth perception, they didnt say it but Brunsons balance / scoring prowess / wiggle in the paint comes to mind.

Can feel be identified before it is obvious on an nba level? A vague quality only obvious in hindsight can't be used as an evaluation metric.
 
Can feel be identified before it is obvious on an nba level? A vague quality only obvious in hindsight can't be used as an evaluation metric.
Watch the video. Its about how good you are at the game and how you use your tools better than others with similar tools. It is defined as one of the main reasons why teams have gotten worse at evaluating talent over the last 7 years measured by the amount of top selections in the finals.
 
Tools are defined by length, height, speed, strength, reach, fg%, etc. All measurables attributes. But two players with identical measurables have very different capabilities. So, the difference is much more minute and nuance.

Feel would be unmeasurable but more along the lines of "He's just got 'IT'." I feel like every time I here talk about Flagg that feel is part of the analysis.
 
Tools are defined by length, height, speed, strength, reach, fg%, etc. All measurables attributes. But two players with identical measurables have very different capabilities. So, the difference is much more minute and nuance.

Feel would be unmeasurable but more along the lines of "He's just got 'IT'." I feel like every time I here talk about Flagg that feel is part of the analysis.

This sounds like a great reason to take Kon.
 
Was Tracey pretty good on the defensive end, because all I've seen of AJ is really freakin' good (against High school kids of course. . .)
I would be willing to bet that Mcgrady was a good defender against high schoolers.
 
Tools are defined by length, height, speed, strength, reach, fg%, etc. All measurables attributes. But two players with identical measurables have very different capabilities. So, the difference is much more minute and nuance.

Feel would be unmeasurable but more along the lines of "He's just got 'IT'." I feel like every time I here talk about Flagg that feel is part of the analysis.

Elite players move more intelligently and effectively than the average players. This applies on both offense and defense. They have advanced timing, nuance and the vision to make plays that average players can't make.

Fears has feel. Tre has feel. Knueppel has feel. Derik Queen has feel. CMB has feel. Jase Richardson has feel. Raynaud and Beringer have some feel. Essengue has a bit of feel.

Having elite physical tools or an elite skill level does help bring a player's feel to life though.
 
Back
Top