What's new

For those of you who don't like Jimmer...

I think the same people who say you can't teach Jimmer's ability to shoot, would agree that you cant' teach someone to have a work ethic. You can teach defense, but if there is no effort then why bother? He stands around and does nothing on defense, waiting until someone else gets a rebound, at which point he runs circles around the court calling for the ball constantly.

There is no doubt in my mind that the Jazz will draft him.
 
But Jimmer isn't the best available, I promise.

How do you know?

it's impossible to tell. We have no clue where we'll be picking and who's even coming out yet.

Of course, I'm sure had Jimmer played up north wearing red you'd be advocating him for the #1 overall pick, right?
 
Just curious, let's assume the Jazz make the playoffs and finish above the top-16 teams and that the Nets' pick is between 6-10. Freddette's draft stock is still fluctuating, but at this point would Jazz fans advocate spending the NJ pick on Jimmer?

I can't see the Jazz taking Fredette in the top 8, as long as one of Derrick Williams, Kyrie Irving, Perry Jones, Harrison Barnes, Enes Kanter, Jonas Valanciunas or other top talent are available. But if it comes down to Fredette vs. an athletic wing whose offensive game is raw, or one of these Euro Ilyasova types, I could see them picking Fredette. Maybe they'd flip their pick with another team a couple spots down in the draft. The Jazz like having a combo-guard in a three-guard rotation, so much that they even pushed Howard Eisley, Derek Fisher and Ronnie Price into that role.

I think they'd look first for an explosive, game-changing wing, then a highly talented center (unless they're totally sold on Tomic), then consider a player like Fredette.

But put it this way: I think Fredette would probably have a bigger impact on the Jazz than Hayward or the other wings we were looking at last year (Xavier Henry, Luke Babbit and Paul George). He's physically mature and ready to play now. If he does nothing more than spread the floor for Kirilenko, Jefferson and Favors to operate, he's doing his job.

I could also see the Jazz making a trade on draft day, using a player like Miles, Tomic and a pick, or maybe Okur's final year deal.
 
I wouldn't take Jimmer at 6 but I would consider him around 14-16. My biggest worry about Jimmer is he going to be able to adapt to not being the star on the team. I think he can play but he certainly will struggle with the length and athleticism in the NBA. How is he going to handle not taking 20 shots a game. The other reservation I have is having to listen to myopic Jimmer followers thinking he should play more. lol. I wouldn't want the Jazz to pick him because he would put people in the seats. If he is the most talented player on the board then pick him.
 
If Jimmer played out east, would ya'll still wanna draft him?

Back east is too vague.

Which conference? And who are his teammates?

Once again, if he's the BPA whenever whenever the jazz draft, take him.
 
Could he even be compared to Steve Nash?
A shooting PG?
Can he handle ball or pass like Nash?
 
Back
Top