What's new
By:

Gordon at PG.

BENTLEY

BENTLEY

Well-Known Member
I had this thought watching the 76s game tonight. Gordo is so much better distributing the ball than Harris is. And he's a good perimeter shooter. But most importantly - he's 6'8". Which is why he's better at the 2 than the 3. And might make him good at the 1 - a position of need for the Jazz, where it would benefit them to have an unselfish playmaker, who can shoot the three if need be, and will tower over opposing team's PGs. Is he too slow? I don't think so.
This also opens up the 2 spot for the K-mart version of Dwyane Wade, Alec Burks. (who's also a good playmaker for his teammates or for himself).

check out this starting lineup:

PG: Hayward
SG: Burks
SF: 2012 draft pick
PF: Millsap
C : Favors

Who was the last 6'8" PG?
Do you think Hayward can excel there?
 
I'd like to see Burks play a bunch before I commit to him starting. Also Harris scoring is nice...
 
I thought of this tonight too. He looked very comfortable with the rock. Not sure he's ultimately athletic enough to play the 1 though. Maybe he is. I wouldn't mind finding out. I also wouldn't mind seeing if Burks could fill this role either. Ya know, if he doesn't DNP.
 
I would be more comfortable if you switched Burks and Hayward in this line up.
 
No, this is so annoying. We need a fast PG who can push tempo, draw fouls, and make easy baskets at the rim. Hayward works well playing off Harris as a wing play maker. Hayward has some PG skills, but he isn't a PG.
 
BluesRocker said:
I like it. I agree. Magic was 6'9"

Why not?

Hayward guarded point guards in college and in high school all the time.
Click to expand...

Hmm........*rubs eyes*

Magic Johnson? The Magic Johnson that was one of the best NBA players of our generation?

Guarded NCAA PG's and High School PG's? By that rational, since both Burks and Jordan are 6'6" they will have similar careers and since I guarded High School PG's I can guard NBA PG's too, eh?
 
Hayward isn't a point guard. He has great court vision and delivers great passing, but this is because he's more suited to being able to receive the ball on the perimeter and either 1. shoot 2. pass 3. drive 4. drive and dish. He excels at 4, which is why I think he's more of Ginobiliesque. He's a great passer, though. I think, because of Hayward's passing, we'd need a point guard who can simply bring the ball up, has some semblance of running the floor and can just stay outside and bomb threes. It's why, despite not initially being impressed with him, I would prefer someone like Jimmer.
 
Bodhi said:
Hmm........*rubs eyes*

Magic Johnson? The Magic Johnson that was one of the best NBA players of our generation?

Guarded NCAA PG's and High School PG's? By that rational, since both Burks and Jordan are 6'6" they will have similar careers and since I guarded High School PG's I can guard NBA PG's too, eh?
Click to expand...


What does your lack of ability have to do with Hayward?


Yes. Burks will be the next Jordan and Hayward is the next Magic/Bird, Favors is the next Dwight Howard, and Kanter is the next Gasol. I really believe that. Pretty good team huh?

Really though. You can't see it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top