homeytennis
Well-Known Member
The NBA said there were two incorrect calls in the last two minutes of regulation in the Lakers game leading to a point swing of at least four points against the Jazz.
I assume one was the Ersan charge?The NBA said there were two incorrect calls in the last two minutes of regulation in the Lakers game leading to a point swing of at least four points against the Jazz.I
Link?The NBA said there were two incorrect calls in the last two minutes of regulation in the Lakers game leading to a point swing of at least four points against the Jazz.
One was the Ersan charge and the other a Schroeder shove off that was not called that lead to a basket.I assume one was the Ersan charge?
It's on the media page. KSL had the story.Link?
It would be nice, but I’d put good money on them not overturning the call and then the L2M report stating it was correct call because Ersan was still moving.If only we had challenged the charge call...
I do get Quin doesn't want to risk losing a time out at the end of a close game. And you still never know if the refs would have changed their call.
Sent from my moto z3 using JazzFanz mobile app
They the judge jury and executioner... if allowed a review they’d have likely kept it as is and then the brotherhood would back em up.It would be nice, but I’d put good money on them not overturning the call and then the L2M report stating it was correct call because Ersan was still moving.
Remember that challenge a couple weeks ago, where Oni went straight up, did not touch the shooter, and remained in perfect position the entire time on a three pointer? It took those morons seven to ten minutes of watching that to see if there was any way out of overturning the call before they realized there was just no way to possibly see it was a foul. They were never going to give Ersan the overturn there. The challenge when applied to anything other than possession or the clock is functionally useless. Holding the timeout was probably better.If only we had challenged the charge call...
I do get Quin doesn't want to risk losing a time out at the end of a close game. And you still never know if the refs would have changed their call.
Sent from my moto z3 using JazzFanz mobile app
Remember that challenge a couple weeks ago, where Oni went straight up, did not touch the shooter, and remained in perfect position the entire time on a three pointer? It took those morons seven to ten minutes of watching that to see if there was any way out of overturning the call before they realized there was just no way to possibly see it was a foul. They were never going to give Ersan the overturn there. The challenge when applied to anything other than possession or the clock is functionally useless. Holding the timeout was probably better.
That's why they need a separate crew to analyze replays, like in the NFL. Send it straight to Secaucus!well the refs hate to admit they are wrong, so they will analyze and analyze the footage for any evidence that they weren't possibly capable of being wrong. it f up but true.
I agree with this. Challenging a foul call seems to rarely work. There's some sort of hyper-teeny contact that can justify most calls.Remember that challenge a couple weeks ago, where Oni went straight up, did not touch the shooter, and remained in perfect position the entire time on a three pointer? It took those morons seven to ten minutes of watching that to see if there was any way out of overturning the call before they realized there was just no way to possibly see it was a foul. They were never going to give Ersan the overturn there. The challenge when applied to anything other than possession or the clock is functionally useless. Holding the timeout was probably better.
Biggus DickusNever mention the name D*** B****** around here again.