7StraightIsGreat
Well-Known Member
So if there are only 6 "cornerstone potential" players, do the teams picking 7-10 say pass?
And with the 7th pick in the 2011 NBA Draft, the Utah Jazz select....."Pass".
Steve Nash, drafted 15th, and many others did not "have the potential" either, and they were only role players on their teams..... until they broke out.
Nash started to get good in Dallas, but really broke out back in Phoenix.
His first year in Phoenix (rookie) he got 10.5 minutes.
There are tons of great players that get slow starts, so I think your claim he (or anyone) doesn't even have potential to be a "cornerstone" player is garbage.
You may be playing the odds by saying that, but many times teams and front offices are proven wrong one way or another.
Jimmer could easily do what Nash did following his first 8 years progression in the league. Play spotty defense, get the averages up to 17 pts and 7 assists shooting 47% from the field, 40% from 3, and 88% from the line.
It's pretty simple:
If I'm a GM with a Top 10 Pick, I'm going to identify the top 10 players that I believe have the potential to be a cornerstone and I don't deviate from that list of 10 players to draft somebody like Jimmer. Obviously, some years there will be more "conerstone" prospects than others and at that point in time, you simply do the best that you can. However, I don't see any scenario where Jimmer is top 10 value in an NBA draft.
Maybe somebody will reach for him and that's fine, but I wouldn't be the one taking that risk. He's a 6 foot tall SG who's got a nice 3 point % and will hustle for you but he's still going to be a huge liability every minute he is on the floor. Maybe I'd feel different if I thought Jimmer would do well as an NBA PG but I don't.
The fact that you can try and compare Jimmer's potential to Steve Nash during any point in Nash's career tells me that you're looking at Jimmer through blue colored glasses which also means you're not going to be swayed by reason and logic.